Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
Or, if there genuinely is a massive difference between degrees, the regulation of qualifications?
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 14:10, 2 replies, latest was 12 years ago)
as opposed to 3 A's, there's a reason for that
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 14:12, Reply)
The use of external examiners is supposed to ensure this. But the more universities, the more shitty courses, the more shitty external examiners available. Obviously, employers in a specialist science/engineering field are unlikely to take your degree in any way seriously if the external examiner moderating it is Bobby Buttfuck from Padstow Tech, but then prospective students, probably understandably, rarely check that.
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 15:46, Reply)
this is why all decent science and engineering degrees are accredited by certain industry bodies.
Unlike a University of Stoke science degree.
There may not even be a University of Stoke. I don't know. The point is valid.
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 14:12, Reply)
They appear to be accredited by Institute of Biomedical Science and the British Psychological Society, amongst others.
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 14:20, Reply)
Now is it?
I never said all degrees from Stoke Poly were shit. Or, for that matter, that all degrees from a redbrick etc. were good. Just the point that "worthless degrees" are not decided purely by field, but by whether that particular course at that particular institution has any value or respect within said field.
(, Tue 29 Oct 2013, 15:26, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread