I'm quite pro smoker's rights, I think the smoking ban went way to far, but anyone who smokes a fag in a car with children is a fucking idiot.

( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 9:06, 1 reply, 12 years ago)

I'm quite pro non smokers rights
I'm pretty fucking happy that I can go out to a restaurant/pub/club without breathing that shit in and stinking of fags by the end of the night.
( Peej, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 9:18, Reply)

*Ctrl+F*, J A S O... hold up now, nobody has done a gay joke here yet?
I don't see whats wrong with designated venues where smoking is allowed under the pretext of Own Risk. Make every product/service in there at a preimium to pay for the lisancing; even in New York, where I think the smoking bans started, have Smoking Clubs.
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 9:26, Reply)

I would have prefered a smoking and non smoking option though
so adults can choose their environment.
(Bonzodog29 is an unemployed sponge of the worst kind, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 9:32, Reply)

adults can choose though
They didn't have the choice before, they had second hand smoke inflicted on them.
(dozers, do fuck off ur a nob m8, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 9:35, Reply)

I agree you seem to be getting the wrong end of my statement
Where is the choice now? Its non smoking or nothing... I always felt there should have been an option for both, so if a non smoking goes into a designated smoking pub etc. then they are aware of what they are doing. and vice versa, I would have been even harder and said that a non smoking establishment would have to have an exclusion zone
(Bonzodog29 is an unemployed sponge of the worst kind, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 9:41, Reply)

.... and the smoking pub could even have some mega ventalation thing too.

( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 9:52, Reply)

That's because you're a fucking idiot who doesn't understnad what you're talking about
the crux of the issue is people who have jobs in pubs shouldn't have to work in smoke filled environments
(Bazongaloid, Wed 29 Jan 2014, 9:53, Reply)