Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
(, Fri 30 May 2014, 14:36, 1 reply, 11 years ago)
(, Fri 30 May 2014, 14:39, Reply)
(, Fri 30 May 2014, 14:42, Reply)
The cunts have just frozen our pensionable salaries, so basically if I retire in (say) 20 years my pension will be based on what I'm on now, rather than my final salary. All I'm adding is 1/60 for every extra year served.
As I say, the cunts.
(, Fri 30 May 2014, 14:55, Reply)
(, Fri 30 May 2014, 15:18, Reply)
They could just put a bit more in to sort it. The cunts.
(, Fri 30 May 2014, 15:36, Reply)
Assuming you have a DC scheme available to take over, it's AOK. Also, non contributory DB scheme and you're complaining? Fucking hell, that's some cheek.
(, Fri 30 May 2014, 15:45, Reply)
When I started in 1995, it was part of the package. Now it's been cut to fuck and we've had no say in it. I don't see how that's cheek.
In fact - correction, we did have a say in it. We were 'consulted', thusly:
Them: Would you mind awfully if we cut your pensions to fuck?
Entire staff: Yes, we very much fucking well would.
Them: Oh, sozzers everyone. :'((((
(, Fri 30 May 2014, 15:53, Reply)
Therefore the guaranteed benefits available from it are worth way more than if you hadn't had any pension in place.
(, Fri 30 May 2014, 16:01, Reply)
But if I was initially promised 'x' and I'm actually going to end up with much less than 'x' then that's shit, isn't it?
(, Fri 30 May 2014, 16:05, Reply)
No doubt he's ok at choosing between the A3 and the A4, portrait or landscape, but your retirement? I wouldn't.
(, Fri 30 May 2014, 16:09, Reply)
(, Fri 30 May 2014, 16:27, Reply)
You haven't been financially disadvantaged. Quite the opposite in fact. Look on the bright side, you have a guaranteed income in retirement. Most people don't.
(, Fri 30 May 2014, 16:32, Reply)
(, Fri 30 May 2014, 16:44, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread