Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
(, Wed 16 Jul 2014, 16:25, 5 replies, latest was 12 years ago)
I can't remember the last time I saw a stand-alone fax machine. They're all attached to multi-function printers. Can't the useless cunt email scan it?
(, Wed 16 Jul 2014, 16:28, Reply)
It also has meant I have answered my phone 32 times to hear a fax beep, but I can't not answer it because there are proper calls in between. It's fucking irritating.
(, Wed 16 Jul 2014, 16:33, Reply)
Turns out the question "can you not use the scanner that's on the same machine you're faxing from?" often offends.
(, Wed 16 Jul 2014, 16:40, Reply)
(, Wed 16 Jul 2014, 16:42, Reply)
This experience is why I reacted so angrily to Nakers' classic "I print out emails and file them" troll.
(, Wed 16 Jul 2014, 16:45, Reply)
(, Wed 16 Jul 2014, 16:59, Reply)
some berk put their phone number on a flyer instead of his own fax number; they got loads of fax machines trying their number again and again and again...
(, Wed 16 Jul 2014, 16:33, Reply)
if you've got historic deeds that didn't envisage email, a huge number of them permit/require service by fax. similarly, it's a valid method of filing documents at court. it'll be necessary for a long time yet.
(, Wed 16 Jul 2014, 16:43, Reply)
with the times it was created. you can't take a deed that was created 20 years ago and say, "imma unilaterally change this so that i can serve by email". it wouldn't be valid!
(, Wed 16 Jul 2014, 16:47, Reply)
Send a fucken carrier pigeon or blow smoke rings.
(, Wed 16 Jul 2014, 16:44, Reply)
also, i would never accept service of court documents by email, unless it's a one-off and i am on the phone whilst we are exchanging.
(, Wed 16 Jul 2014, 16:44, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread