Not always.

( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 13:38, 1 reply, 10 years ago)

presumably
you will be giving your house and any money to society rather than to your kids?

we all know your "achievement" already. you're leaving behind giant round black coasters to protect future generations of coffee tables.
( rachelswipe with a fork, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 13:42, Reply)

Indirectly through taxation, yes.
I'm pretty proud of my "achievement" and am glad there will be something left after I am dead.
( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 13:47, Reply)

no, that's avoiding the question
are you leaving your house and any saved money to your kids? you seem to be against other people saving and passing it down, so presumably you'd never do it yourself.
( rachelswipe with a fork, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 13:51, Reply)

I'm not sure where you got that idea from

( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 13:53, Reply)

It's the people who would save it that are part of the problem.

( rachelswipe with a fork, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 13:58, Reply)

Oh right, you misunderstood me.
As Bonzo or someone pointed out in the same subthread, spending the £71 would provide more of a stimulation for the economy than squirrelling it away.
I am not against saving, in fact I think it is a sensible thing to do.
( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 14:02, Reply)

stop being sensible
you want everyone to give their houses up in some kind of giant yurt fest, admit it.
( rachelswipe with a fork, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 14:18, Reply)

+ in the nude

( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Wed 20 Aug 2014, 14:21, Reply)