b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 2386682 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

on behalf of my kids
I'd happily receive a tax cut equivalent to the value of the benefit. Far more efficient
(, Wed 8 Oct 2014, 11:04, 2 replies, latest was 10 years ago)
not for parents at the bottom of the scale
And not for HMRC either.
(, Wed 8 Oct 2014, 11:06, Reply)
why should I pay for some povvo's ghastly crotch fruit who will most likely grow up to be
track suit wearing, chain smoking drains on society?
(, Wed 8 Oct 2014, 11:08, Reply)
because you live in the UK and that's what happens

(, Wed 8 Oct 2014, 11:09, Reply)
i didn't vote for it

(, Wed 8 Oct 2014, 11:10, Reply)
tough shit
Welcome to democracy.
(, Wed 8 Oct 2014, 11:14, Reply)
sounds like I'm being forced into something i don't wanna do
sounds a bit like a dictatorship
(, Wed 8 Oct 2014, 11:17, Reply)
nah m8, parliamentary democracy innit

(, Wed 8 Oct 2014, 11:21, Reply)
I'd love that.
Currently I just pay the tax and the ex-wife gets the benefit.
(, Wed 8 Oct 2014, 11:06, Reply)
it makes sense to remove benefits for more affluent people and tax them less

(, Wed 8 Oct 2014, 11:08, Reply)
no, it doesn't

(, Wed 8 Oct 2014, 11:08, Reply)
yes it does, it'll remove the adminstration costs involved in collecting the money, processing it and then giving it back
simplify maaan
(, Wed 8 Oct 2014, 11:10, Reply)
no, it really doesn't

(, Wed 8 Oct 2014, 11:14, Reply)
yes it does

(, Wed 8 Oct 2014, 11:18, Reply)
no, it doesn't.

(, Wed 8 Oct 2014, 11:20, Reply)
i can get on board with this

(, Wed 8 Oct 2014, 11:28, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 836, 835, 834, 833, 832, ... 1