Yup, deffo, speaking of how 'beuty' changes; did you see this?
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xrp0zJZu0a4

I think the only ones that really had it wrong is herion-chique
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Fri 6 Feb 2015, 12:44, 2 replies, latest was 11 years ago)

nah, I have no interest in women body types

( GeordieJay Bummers are deaf, Fri 6 Feb 2015, 12:47, Reply)

Cool, cool.
I'm not one of these people who lears at women, I got lots of mates who; whenever they see a hot girl they tell me what they want to do to them and all that.... and that's just Not Me. I like girls, don't get me wrong, but I just dont' have that animal-instinct.

I'd have thought you'd like that on the basis of the history and definition of beuty-standard.
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Fri 6 Feb 2015, 12:51, Reply)

he's a queer gonz

( Windy Pig I'm naturally quite suspicious about the moon., Fri 6 Feb 2015, 12:53, Reply)

Aye, but if it was fellas, i'd still be interested in that video.

( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Fri 6 Feb 2015, 12:55, Reply)

Probably would only wank off the once though; instead of three times.
Just to prove a point.
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Fri 6 Feb 2015, 12:55, Reply)

Dont get me wrong, I appreciate the female form. I just don't seek it out.

( GeordieJay Bummers are deaf, Fri 6 Feb 2015, 13:02, Reply)

fair 'nuff

( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Fri 6 Feb 2015, 13:18, Reply)

It wasn't particularly comprehensive or accurate and seemed skewed towards a fat ok/skinny bad agenda and few of the models actually fitted the body types they were supposed to represent..
But yeah, I managed to wank to it.
( tangledupinblue hairy badge with moving eyes, Fri 6 Feb 2015, 13:10, Reply)