Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | Popular
www.guardian.co.uk/music/2009/sep/24/ian-brown-my-way-review
of the new Ian Brown album, perfectly encapsulates my views on the stupid monkey faced twat in a way I probably never could.
Come on you Ian Brown devotees, tell my I'm wrong, and please try and explain to me that the first Stone Roses album was more than four or five sublime guitar based pop songs glued together with a bunch of weakly produced filler tracks.
(, Fri 25 Sep 2009, 7:48, 45 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
but that review is tremendous. Had me chuckling like a nutcase here!
(, Fri 25 Sep 2009, 8:29, Reply)
he said. I quite like the stone roses in a passive sort of way, but otherwise I've never had any interaction with Ian Browns stuff. He does bear a startling resemblance to a baboon though, and that review is blisteringly scathing. I like.
(, Fri 25 Sep 2009, 8:34, Reply)
love spreads is the best stone roses song. and that's only because of the great guitar intro.
ian brown can fuck off
(, Fri 25 Sep 2009, 9:17, Reply)
(, Fri 25 Sep 2009, 9:24, Reply)
that you have strange lapses in sentence formation.
And are smug.
And beardy.
But we don't really love you, you love yourself too much for us to get a look in.
(, Fri 25 Sep 2009, 9:30, Reply)
(, Fri 25 Sep 2009, 9:35, Reply)
anyway, there's other proof. The over-abundance of samurai for example.
(, Fri 25 Sep 2009, 9:53, Reply)
Al needs to become Prime Minister.
(, Fri 25 Sep 2009, 9:45, Reply)
The first Stone Roses album was NOT more than four or five sublime guitar based pop songs glued together with a bunch of weakly produced filler tracks. It was infinitely less.
A limpid, badly-produced weedy sub-60s beat group pastiche at best. 'The best UK album ever' according to The Observer: Jesus fucking Christ, what an insult to this nation's output.
Dribbly, uninspiring and wholly unoriginal, like an even-gayer version of the fucking Hollies or the Merseybeats - it did NOT capture the spirit of the time - unless you happened to be a wet middle-class student who also liked the Inspiral fucking Carpets.
Oh, they put a looped James Brown beat over some wet indie pop - whoah there! Revolutionary and grounbdbreaking! At that time there was a real musical revolution going on and it was in the world of rave. Like it or not (and most of it was shit) it was genuinely new and was to my mind the last real innovation in popular music.
Insipid twaddle for benders.
I HAVE SPOKEN.
(, Fri 25 Sep 2009, 9:55, Reply)
don't hold back.
pretty well summed up though. I particularly agree with your point on this "The best UK album ever' according to The Observer: Jesus fucking Christ, what an insult to this nation's output. "
that sort of comment gets bandied around by idiot muso journalists far too often
(, Fri 25 Sep 2009, 9:57, Reply)
All too familiar.
I was DJing a "Classic British Rock And Metal Night", and someone came and requested The Libertines.
Really? "Classic"?
*sighs*
(, Fri 25 Sep 2009, 9:59, Reply)
It's just pretty sad really.
He then poured scorn upon Led Zeppelin. How to make friends and influence people, eh?
(, Fri 25 Sep 2009, 10:08, Reply)
(The sort I'm inclined to start labelling as pugs: Punchable Under-Graduates)
(, Fri 25 Sep 2009, 10:31, Reply)
So he was wearing ripped jeans and one of those stupid old red military tunic things.
(, Fri 25 Sep 2009, 10:41, Reply)
a twat.
I think I'd have fished the Libertines LP out of the box and smashed it over his nob.
(, Fri 25 Sep 2009, 10:43, Reply)
one of the most underated bands I feel.
(, Fri 25 Sep 2009, 10:10, Reply)
It tells you nothing about British music and everything about the demographic of Observer writers/readers.
Arseclap.
(, Fri 25 Sep 2009, 10:01, Reply)
that this wasn't about The Clash..
(, Fri 25 Sep 2009, 10:19, Reply)
I like some of their stuff, but so much of it was utter wank.
(, Fri 25 Sep 2009, 10:24, Reply)
Just don't listen to anything after London Calling because absolutely everything before is sublime.
(, Fri 25 Sep 2009, 10:46, Reply)
« Go Back | Reply To This »