Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
there is no right and wrong, merely things you get and things you don't.
peer based psychotherapy is widely recognised as highly effective.
or perhaps you don't get that?
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 23:34, 2 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
SUPERVISED peer-based psychotherapy. Or do you advocate packing a room full of lunatics and letting them get on with it?
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 23:37, Reply)
NOW I remember the reason why I cancelled my birthday bash!
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 23:38, Reply)
Bashes are supervised. I won't go unless I'm accompanied by someone with a fucking certificate.
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 23:42, Reply)
Unless you're now qualified to shoot people right in the emo.
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 23:50, Reply)
I was asked today however, if I was 'one of those self harmers'. Apparently the fact that the person's cat was mauling my arm at the time escaped their notice.
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 23:52, Reply)
having said that, I take it you've seen me on the journey to work. It aint pretty.
(, Fri 9 Oct 2009, 0:00, Reply)
I'ld love to do some sort of shooting.
(, Fri 9 Oct 2009, 0:04, Reply)
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 23:52, Reply)
and "lunatics" is a bit 19th century for me.
if you have ever observed or participated any peer based psychotherapy then you will be aware of how little input is required from the "supervisor". the vast majority of the "words of wisdom" come from the mouths of the "lunatics".
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 23:43, Reply)
i was actually asked if i were a human-rights lawyer by a woman who mistook the political statement of my guantanamo bay t-shirt for reality. that is what the sig is about, nothing more or less.
and i don't think for one minute that you were being serious there. unless...
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 23:53, Reply)
I have thankfully managed to avoid any kind of psychotherapy thus far, but regardless of their "input" one would assume that a qualified supervisor provides a certain amount of "teacher in the room" constraints on behaviour. And, certainly if you're feeling fragile, threads here largely lack that - I take it you didn't see the famous suicide thread? Becuase I guarantee you, the same sort of behaviour would have gone on were it the person in question who'd started the thread rather than a concerned friend. And that wouldn't have ended well.
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 23:50, Reply)
But this place, esspeicalay most of hte people here, arn't anominius.
And there is a great danger of replacing real life friends with online ones, and that leads to a self distrcutive path.
(, Fri 9 Oct 2009, 0:08, Reply)
Well maybe a couple.
(, Fri 9 Oct 2009, 0:11, Reply)
In a world where you want to shut everything out, all the emotions and reactions, you'll become more absorbed in it, and the more you are, the less your offline mates see if you.
(, Fri 9 Oct 2009, 0:15, Reply)
Expecting to be able to unburden yourself online, especially somewhere like b3ta, without getting horrifically negative reactions (from trolls, people that just don't like you or indeed folks who're just in bad mood) that can be really quite damaging - that strikes me as an error.
(, Fri 9 Oct 2009, 0:12, Reply)
A negative comment from a stranger would mean nothing to me, one from someone form here would mean something, and from real life mates it'll be really negative.
This place removes a lot of the whole human contact experiance (facial expresions, moods, phsyical..etc), so it's too easy.
(, Fri 9 Oct 2009, 0:19, Reply)
there is no perfect system to deal with the multi-faceted thing that is flawed human psychology.
and flawed is what we all are.
every single one of us.
(, Fri 9 Oct 2009, 0:19, Reply)
i wonder just how many of the tens of thousands of b3tans actually know each other?
i'm not sure that an anonymous forum is any more or less effective. the trust that grows in a psych group is a different kind of trust than that which can develope online, surely?
(, Fri 9 Oct 2009, 0:16, Reply)
in participating in group psychotherapy the individuals involved need to open up fully to reap the full benefit. some can do this, some cannot. for some people other forms of therapy are more appropriate. those who engage fully very quickly cease to perceive the supervisor as the "teacher in the room", i have observed. the group becomes a place where the troubles can be taken, where the deepest aspects can be discussed and wisdom shared.
this is not cod psychology. this is knowledge, experience and understanding.
i did see the thread in question.
(, Fri 9 Oct 2009, 0:11, Reply)
... you'll know it's not just sharing, it's sharing AND human contact at the same time, and this place doesn't provide full human contact.
It's easy to say everything on here, it's a lot harder to do it in a room full of people. Eventually, you'll become a social recluse if you do that sort of thing here.
(, Fri 9 Oct 2009, 0:13, Reply)
I mean, I like the way you have used references and provided evidence from your years of experience in the field.
Also, what Wookie said.
(, Thu 8 Oct 2009, 23:39, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread