No, no, no, no, no.
It's not enough to say that one person has some views and another has others. If those views are in contradiction, at least one must be wrong.

You can't then back away and retain a slight shred of intellectual integrity.
( Enzyme is powered by sunlight, Wed 11 Nov 2009, 13:55, 1 reply, 16 years ago)

But to prove which is wrong
would mean to prove the existence or non-existence of a deity, which cannot be done.

Were we debating about Dark Matter vs the Modified Theory of Newtonian Dynamics (reference here) that might apply- but just as I can't prove that a god exists, you can't prove that there's definitely nothing there.

Ergo, I'm willing to accept a difference of opinion and leave it at that.
( The Resident Loon Not a demographic. Do not measure., Wed 11 Nov 2009, 14:05, Reply)

Surely the burden of proof is on the person claiming something exists and that nobody can disprove it.

(PsychoChomp, Wed 11 Nov 2009, 14:12, Reply)

This ^^^

( Naked Ape call me Caitlyn, Wed 11 Nov 2009, 15:40, Reply)