I basically ignore her because she doesn't really contribute to anything I'm interested in.
When she starts a thread specifically and exclusivly to call someone I know and like a cunt. I got involved. i didn't just flame her for no reason, I also told her to stop before I did.
I wasn't trolling and it wasn't an unproked attack on a innocent person. This whole thing is fucking stupid...
(PsychoChomp, Wed 11 Nov 2009, 21:07, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)

does anyone even half understand where I'm coming from?
Or is my attempt to justify myself pointless?
(PsychoChomp, Wed 11 Nov 2009, 21:23, Reply)

Dude, you really were totally out of order. If you had investigated or thought a bit before blindly jumping in to help yer pal...
Then you MAY (or may not) have worked out WHY wbm was having a pop at Gonz.
Basically she got sick of him insinuating that she was/was not a cat abuser.
In her shoes I would have done the same.
Only an utter fuckwhit BLINDLY leaps to the defence of someone in those circumstances.
ESPECIALLY in the manner you chose.
( blaireau69 , the Cumbrian Travis Bickle., Wed 11 Nov 2009, 21:35, Reply)

And yes...
I do understand what you are trying to justify.
( blaireau69 , the Cumbrian Travis Bickle., Wed 11 Nov 2009, 21:38, Reply)

this is utterly utterly fucking ridiculous

( Lisette von Falcon, Wed 11 Nov 2009, 21:40, Reply)

ok i have a few points in response
Why should I investigate anything when replying to posts?
If you're posting something that isn't general knowledge then expect confusion, you cannot expect every user to know your motivation for a post either you accept the confusion or you don't post.

Secondly I know why he was mocking her and it was in response to her frankly appalling "I had a fight tongiht I totally punched three guys out" post. That is not something to boast about and it deserved to be mocked.

Thirdly, I didn't blindly leap to his defence, I said "don't pick on gonzo you'll lose" she then replied saying she wasn't.

We can pick apart what specifically in my final response was so terrible later.
(PsychoChomp, Wed 11 Nov 2009, 21:46, Reply)

I don't like this at all.
Can we please have less bullying of psychochomp now? ta
( Lisette von Falcon, Wed 11 Nov 2009, 21:52, Reply)

Okay, I shall try and keep it simple.
"Why should I investigate anything when replying to posts?
If you're posting something that isn't general knowledge then expect confusion, you cannot expect every user to know your motivation for a post either you accept the confusion or you don't post."
Firstly, do I really need to answer that initial question? Why on earth would anyone ever want to inform themselves before entering a discussion? Er, I dunno, maybe so they don't come across as a complete fuckwhit?
Secondly, none of the a priori information is anything but general knowledge. Posted publicly on a public website on the internet. Gottit?
Thirdly, motivation is irrelevant.

"Secondly I know why he was mocking her and it was in response to her frankly appalling "I had a fight tongiht I totally punched three guys out" post. That is not something to boast about and it deserved to be mocked."
We need to clear this up. wbm got fed up with Gonz making basically abusive references to her cat as I mentioned in my previous thread. It was not about the violence incident. That incident actually referred to her leaping (not blindly) to the actual physical defence of the son of her partner. At no point did she brag about her actions. If you had bothered to check the source material you would be aware of this. Again, this is all publicly available info.

Finally, you DID leap blindly in simply by chosing to act before equipping yourself with the relevant facts. I think that satisfies the definition rather well. And you did so with a deliberately menacing use of words.

For someone with a degree in Psychology you really do let the academic side down.

You may think that i am being an utter cunt here but yet again you would be mistaken.
( blaireau69 , the Cumbrian Travis Bickle., Wed 11 Nov 2009, 22:24, Reply)

your first line sets the tone for your reply so I'll be equally as patronising.
however I won't copy and paste your replies, I think you may be able to work it out.

Firstly yes you do have to answer the question. This is not an essay, do you expect every new member of the board to read the archives? Do you read every thread every day? Or do you just wait for your interfriends to gaz you something to be offended about?
Secondly, I don't read every thread as i mentioned above.
Thirdly, I disagree, context is everything and motivation is vitally important. What's your motivation?

This is getting off the point, as I have said I don't know the ins and outs of every fucking thing that happens here, your expectation that I do is frankly deluded. I read that post, I thought it was fucking shit, it smacked of internet lies and hardmanning. She said "Punched out 3 guys before getting hit myself" she couldn't in a million years "punch out" 3 guys. Therefore bragging.

Ok, did I or did I not tell her to stop picking on gonz? (I'll answer that for you, you'll take to long to reply. Yes I did)

Her responce was: "I am not picking on her
just asking a geniune question."

then I said. "Oh fuck off,
you are, and your one a day posts about your shit life are getting tiresome. I don't give a fuck about fishing and your cat has a shit name."

Right asking why someone is a cunt is not a "genuine question." I'm sure you'll agree with that.

Now which parts of my response are particularly offensive?
"Fuck off" I think if that was the case we'll all be banned.
"I don't give a fuck about fishing" really? are you offended by that?
"your cat has a shit name." now I know b3ta is a bit of a cat lovers paradise but that's not a banning offence.
So I can only guess the offence and the big drama is based on me saying. "your one a day posts about your shit life are getting tiresome" HAVE YOU FUCKING READ ANY OF HER POSTS??????? I will stand by that statment forever, she posts about once a day and it is nearly exclusivley moaning about how shit her life is.

Don't worry love, I only got a 2:2, your accademic superiority is safe.

You are being an utter cunt, you and all your overdramatic friends. Not to me though, to worksboresme, she is front and center to something she didn't want and didn't ask for because you and your gaz friends have an axe to grind and are trying to control offtopic. I bet she thanks you a lot.
(PsychoChomp, Wed 11 Nov 2009, 22:51, Reply)

^This is Perfect.

( Devil_In_Tights the *real* DiT!, Wed 11 Nov 2009, 22:53, Reply)

This is hilarious

( fuck shit up the best you never had, Wed 11 Nov 2009, 23:01, Reply)

Needs moar linebreaks.

( crackhouseceilidhband Fuck off back to Mumsnet, Wed 11 Nov 2009, 23:38, Reply)

...
1) drink less
2) do fewer and less drugs
3) get more quality sleep
4) get more health in your diet
5) take more exercise (good honest hard work fits the bill and is cheaper the gym)
6) grow up and stop being a total reactionary wanker...

The B69 6 point plan!
You'll love it or your money back.

Anywho, I'm off upstairs to make lovely love to my lovely wife, so goodnight and god bless...
( blaireau69 , the Cumbrian Travis Bickle., Wed 11 Nov 2009, 23:12, Reply)

I thought you were a girl.

(PsychoChomp, Wed 11 Nov 2009, 23:14, Reply)

I would like my money back.

( crackhouseceilidhband Fuck off back to Mumsnet, Wed 11 Nov 2009, 23:41, Reply)

holy shit you're going to have sex?

( glued eel /questions/questionsyoudliketoask/post1648081, Thu 12 Nov 2009, 23:53, Reply)

oh man can you imagine??
i wonder what it's like to touch a lady?
( Lightguy hail satan, Fri 13 Nov 2009, 0:21, Reply)

Laughing at
'fewer and less drugs'
( WormuIus, Thu 10 Feb 2011, 20:05, Reply)

I'm not here to defend workboresme.
I'm a positive person - negativity, animosity and antipathy depresses me.

I accept that WBM can be a little bit - well, dismal at times but I can't accept that a directed attack upon her enhances our odd little community.

I deliberately set out to lay into you a few nights ago, which is very unlike the persona I usually assume for B3TA.

I can do it again, or not, depending upon whether this petty feud is over.
( The Disappointed Caravanner of the year, Wed 11 Nov 2009, 21:24, Reply)

If you're not defending her then why keep rattling on about it?
I'll be the first to admit that I really don't know the whole story but it seems to me like she's the one who started this whole mess.
If she doesn't want to be mocked or bullied she shouldn't come here.
Everyone is fair game.
( Lisette von Falcon, Wed 11 Nov 2009, 21:28, Reply)

This whole thing is about defending workboresme, (apparently against her will)
I have spoken to wbm about this, we're not exactly friends but there's no ongoing problems.
This is becoming a sustained attack against me, personally. Which is going on via gaz and not in public. I have said nothing over gaz which I wouldn't repeat here.
(PsychoChomp, Wed 11 Nov 2009, 21:36, Reply)

No Chompy, it really isn't.
It's about trying to tackle the unnecessary cuntishness that gets directed at what are percieved by some as easy targets.
( blaireau69 , the Cumbrian Travis Bickle., Wed 11 Nov 2009, 21:51, Reply)

then why aren't you taking it up with Gonz, whom as you say started the whole thing?

( Lisette von Falcon, Wed 11 Nov 2009, 21:53, Reply)

Don't worry about me,
I'd rather they say what they think I did wrong openly.
(PsychoChomp, Wed 11 Nov 2009, 21:57, Reply)

everything is your fault ever

( Lisette von Falcon, Wed 11 Nov 2009, 21:59, Reply)

Have I asked for anyone to be banned, ever?

(PsychoChomp, Wed 11 Nov 2009, 21:55, Reply)

And I'll back down.
I have standards and perceptions of an idealistic life.

Psychochomp thinks I'm smug, but the B3TANs I know understand that I pretty much live it.

So I'm being smug, but I've no stomach for on-line vitriol when off-line life is far more fuzzy and fluffy.
( The Disappointed Caravanner of the year, Wed 11 Nov 2009, 21:54, Reply)

At least you're not as smug as Vipros

(PsychoChomp, Wed 11 Nov 2009, 21:56, Reply)

Smug smug smug
Five bedroomed house with only six years left on the mortgage.

Sufficient investments that I should be able to retire in nine or ten years time.

Two fantastic pedigree dogs.

Cracking social life.

And - a recent development - rather splendid new woman in my life.

Oddly I feel rather guilty about laying all that out so let me be human as well.

Psychochomp - I thought you were a rather ill-tempered one trick pony but you've acquitted yourself well this evening.
( The Disappointed Caravanner of the year, Wed 11 Nov 2009, 22:17, Reply)