I don't actually know any of them
I was simply being facetious.
(Bazongaloid, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 14:24, 1 reply, 16 years ago)

pick one
thevoidmusic.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/cia_pearl_master_jpg_resized1.jpg
(PsychoChomp, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 14:25, Reply)

one in the middle and the one on the left

( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 14:28, Reply)

I would say 1>3>5>2>4
from left to right.
(PsychoChomp, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 14:28, Reply)

is that order of preference?
or if not, what is your scoring based on
( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 14:29, Reply)

That's the order of most attractive to least
It's based on me objectifying them until they're nothing more than sex dolls.
(PsychoChomp, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 14:32, Reply)

naturally
I would definitely say the one in the middle has by far the prettiest face though.
( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 14:33, Reply)

In that picture definatley,
she looks a bit like posh spice sometimes though and that knocks her down a peg.
(PsychoChomp, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 14:34, Reply)

ah, I haven't seen them on anything else
I hate to admit it, but when the spice girls were first around, posh was my favourite, looks wise. now she is just awful though
( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 14:36, Reply)

Agreed.
And it always sounded wrong to say you wanted to shag 'Baby'.
(Tugnut Ex of this parish, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 14:38, Reply)

2..3.1.5.4

(Tugnut Ex of this parish, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 14:29, Reply)

Can I have the face of the one second from left with the outfit of the one on the right and the body of the one second from right.

(Bazongaloid, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 14:29, Reply)

Actually, I want the face of the middle one instead.

(Bazongaloid, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 14:30, Reply)

good choice
I was about to slate you for choosing an ugly face

if we are doing it your way, I'd have the face and outfit from the one in the middle and the body from the one on the right
( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 14:31, Reply)

If you put that picture full size...
no I'm not saying it.
(PsychoChomp, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 14:37, Reply)

haha

( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 14:38, Reply)

There's no camel toe
but it does look like the buttock on the one on the right has been altered somehow.
(Bazongaloid, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 14:40, Reply)

I'll get the superglue, you get the axe.

(PsychoChomp, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 14:31, Reply)

No
Not unless you want to be arrested for dismemberment.
(Flim-Flam the Magnificent "You is talking loco and I like it!", Fri 4 Dec 2009, 14:31, Reply)