[something like] "I do not agree with your opinon, but I respect your right to have it".
I think the group is disgusting and wrong, but there has been no evidence given to the people that such activity's will lead to voilance.

This means one of two things
- They really do have strong terrorism links, and the goverment is still in the process of stopping them... And if they reveal them, it'll compromise operations.
- The government has bowed to pressure from the public and have taken away the rights of an organisation that has little or no links to terrorist organisations.
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Tue 12 Jan 2010, 14:22, 4 replies, latest was 16 years ago)

I'm pretty sure we (or 'the west') bombed the fuck out of half the world at somepoint or another to stop exactly what we just did.

( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Tue 12 Jan 2010, 14:23, Reply)

Given that Shithead Johnson
had already said that their protest march should be banned because some people wouldn't like it, your second option is much more likely.
(Bazongaloid, Tue 12 Jan 2010, 14:24, Reply)

"I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
Voltaire. Surprisingly ballsy for a Frenchman.
( The Light in Chains don't touch the Pope's boner, Tue 12 Jan 2010, 14:40, Reply)

Hang the bounders, I say.

( Monty Boyce, My cheese game is strong, Tue 12 Jan 2010, 15:23, Reply)