b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 634255 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | Popular

SPACE
www.theregister.co.uk/2010/02/04/nasa_r2_robot/

How awesome are they? Or are you terrified?
(, Tue 9 Feb 2010, 11:32, 20 replies, latest was 16 years ago)

10 GET COCK
20 UP 25, DOWN 25
30 GOTO 10
(, Tue 9 Feb 2010, 11:37, Reply)
That's pretty Basic

(, Tue 9 Feb 2010, 11:44, Reply)
Fortranately, I'm not a complex person.

(, Tue 9 Feb 2010, 11:48, Reply)
I C what you did there

(, Tue 9 Feb 2010, 11:52, Reply)
Fancy a fruit Pascal?

(, Tue 9 Feb 2010, 11:56, Reply)
I'd rather not dbase myself any further.

(, Tue 9 Feb 2010, 12:01, Reply)
I'm going to make you SQ(uea)L for that one

(, Tue 9 Feb 2010, 12:09, Reply)
Aspecially for you.

(, Tue 9 Feb 2010, 12:10, Reply)
We are assembling quite a lisp here

(, Tue 9 Feb 2010, 12:19, Reply)
Fortranning purposes only

(, Tue 9 Feb 2010, 12:28, Reply)
well obviously robot =awesome
but I can't help wondering what the actual functional advantage is in making them human shaped.
(, Tue 9 Feb 2010, 11:49, Reply)
I think it's so if they break down a person could use their tools.
or something.
(, Tue 9 Feb 2010, 11:59, Reply)
Naah, It is so they are shaggable
Without the interspecies guilt thing.
(, Tue 9 Feb 2010, 12:02, Reply)
makes sence of the hands I suppose
but why not give them more armes for example and the head, i assume is contains a camera and it's in a good place for that but making it head shaped? It's just pointless anthropomorphism.
(, Tue 9 Feb 2010, 12:06, Reply)
For someone who can spell 'anthropomorphism'
you didn't half fuck the rest of that post up.
(, Tue 9 Feb 2010, 12:13, Reply)
Ha!

(, Tue 9 Feb 2010, 13:06, Reply)
Two ideas here
1: The robot is working alongside humans, and being controlled by them. It makes sense that the operator senses what the robot senses in a human way. If the robot bangs its knee for example, the operator would detect a banged knee. without having to think, what was that.

2: For the robot, it is working in a human environment, and needs to be able to get at the same things a human can. No use having 3 metre arms or be as big as a brief case, as the situation should not exist where it faces problems a human would not be able to solve too.
(, Tue 9 Feb 2010, 12:17, Reply)
Pah.
Give it two years and they'll be sitting around, wanking in front of the telly and living on the dole.
(, Tue 9 Feb 2010, 11:49, Reply)
man, I can't wait for AI to come along
and show us that robots are just as ill-motivated as the rest of us

edit: AI, not AL. Althegeordie isn't going to show us anything.

except maybe his twig and giggleberries
(, Tue 9 Feb 2010, 12:09, Reply)
Clicking this edit.

(, Tue 9 Feb 2010, 14:32, Reply)

« Go Back | Reply To This »

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1