b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 739115 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

I'm going to put this out there, Tom Cruise is a good actor.

(, Fri 28 May 2010, 12:08, 3 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
You see if you say this
then people laugh at you.

Yet I've seen films where he was really good
(, Fri 28 May 2010, 12:09, Reply)
Tom Cruise was in all the best films of the 80s
Top Gun, Cocktail, Days of Thunder erm.. some more I've forgotten.

I generally think the better his teeth got the more of a crazy cuntoid he became
(, Fri 28 May 2010, 12:25, Reply)
RISKY BUSINESS!!

(, Fri 28 May 2010, 12:28, Reply)
Yes he is
It's just a shame he's a mental
(, Fri 28 May 2010, 12:09, Reply)
I agree
he was brilliant in Interview with a Vampire, it was a completely different role from all the Top Gun style stuff he did.
(, Fri 28 May 2010, 12:10, Reply)
He was really good in that film where robert downey jr blacked up.
edit: Tropic Thunder.
(, Fri 28 May 2010, 12:10, Reply)
I love Robert Downey Junior so much.
He's on my list of 5 people I hope to leave Wiggy for one day. I think he's actually number one. Yes, yes he is.

I loved him in Kiss Kiss Bang Bang. Val Kilmer was awesome in that too.
(, Fri 28 May 2010, 12:13, Reply)
I didn't understand that film
and I haven't watched it again, but I did enjoy it.
(, Fri 28 May 2010, 12:14, Reply)
I don't remember not understanding
but that probably means I missed something important.
(, Fri 28 May 2010, 12:18, Reply)
I endorse the first half of this post.

(, Fri 28 May 2010, 12:26, Reply)
he was much better than Brad Pitt in that

(, Fri 28 May 2010, 12:10, Reply)
yeah Brad Pitt was a bit lame.

(, Fri 28 May 2010, 12:12, Reply)
I read the book years and years ago
and Lestat was cooler than Louis anyway
(, Fri 28 May 2010, 12:20, Reply)
yeah definitely
I read the book only recently, it was awesome. I think the film was a good adaptation though.

EDIT: Although they totally missed out the homoeroticism between Louis and Armand
(, Fri 28 May 2010, 12:27, Reply)
and the fact that Armand was supposed to look about 15
the following couple of books are worth a read too, but they become more shit after that.

The Vampire Armand is basically gay vampire paedo fiction
(, Fri 28 May 2010, 12:31, Reply)
hahaha
that's a winning combination. Beats the hell out of Twilight
(, Fri 28 May 2010, 12:39, Reply)
in a similar way he was great in Magnolia
also, see Rain Man for further evidence
(, Fri 28 May 2010, 12:12, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1