But that's Oxford.
2.1 is like WOAAAAAH.

R__ got a 2.1 and sulked, and blamed fancying some unobtainable girl on fucking up his exams. I am sensible, I try to keep that out of exam season.
( Lampito rise with the moon, go to bed with the sun, Mon 12 Jul 2010, 13:25, 2 replies, latest was 16 years ago)

but a third?
I had to retake :(
( Amberl was stripey and dominated Europe, Mon 12 Jul 2010, 13:27, Reply)

Congratulations
A 2.2 is not to be sniffed at, especially if you didn't revise for it. And there's no harm in getting a third on one module if your average is still around a 2.2/2.1.

Anyone who gets a 2.1 and sulks needs to get a grip on reality. Or I'll slap them across the face with my "2.1."
(LongJohnBaldry, Mon 12 Jul 2010, 13:47, Reply)

I donno if you can put ".... but I didn't revise for it" on your CV.

( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Mon 12 Jul 2010, 13:50, Reply)

This is true
Still, it's only her first year, and they only ever count for a tiny fraction of the whole degree. If she can get a 2.2 without revising for it then it's probably a promising start.
(LongJohnBaldry, Mon 12 Jul 2010, 13:58, Reply)

worked for me

( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Mon 12 Jul 2010, 14:17, Reply)

I told him that.
I'm right, he is living in Baron's Court.

I got 3 2:1s, a 2:2 and a First. Not that bad, really.
( Lampito rise with the moon, go to bed with the sun, Mon 12 Jul 2010, 14:15, Reply)

Hehe, it will amuse me if he has the same landlord I used to rent from (harmless charlatan, resulted in many amusing stories that T and I still reminisce about to this day)
Not that bad? I'd say that's a bloody good start. Nicely done.
(LongJohnBaldry, Mon 12 Jul 2010, 14:24, Reply)