Well there's billions of humans so her point is still valid.

(PsychoChomp, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:46, 3 replies, latest was 16 years ago)

I do apreciate that the odds don't change much with that few copies.

( Bartleby A dead man on vacation, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:47, Reply)

Fucking hell!
Stop the internet, Chompy just agreed with Blousey.
( Davros' Granddad a voice of calm reason in a world of spastics., Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:48, Reply)

There are thousands if not more, of copies of that book
There is only of that one, that exactly, that only book.

There was one of that exactly, that only human being. There are not even copies of him anymore.
(Aberracion Life's getting very complicated, but a lot of fun., Tue 3 Aug 2010, 10:48, Reply)

There are not thousands of copies of the first folio.
Only 1000 were ever printed, and only between 230-240 still exist - and each one is individual from the next, which is how they proved that the book that was stolen was the one from Durham.

I'm not saying that a book is worth more than a life, far from it, by the way, but I am saying that the sentence given to the man for defacing a part of British (and literary) history for personal gain is bang on.
( Devil_In_Tights the *real* DiT!, Tue 3 Aug 2010, 12:22, Reply)