Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
I disagree with your second point although sadly there is no arguing with the first
(, Tue 24 Aug 2010, 16:39, 1 reply, 16 years ago)
I liked the books. Not rabidly, but well enough, and I get bored of people proclaiming that 42 is the meaning of life and then looking all proud of themselves.
(, Tue 24 Aug 2010, 16:41, Reply)
You made it apparent that people who give the response I gave above and look proud of themselves annoy you. I was illustrating that I am unlikely to have fulfilled the second half of the criteria
Oh, I SEE! You were riffing on my low self-esteem to ensure that I know my place and concede the argument! WELL done, you must be SO proud
(, Tue 24 Aug 2010, 16:51, Reply)
what I was saying wasn't even aimed at you, but justifying my empathy for Chompy's point.
Frankly, I'm slightly offended that you think I've done what you've described in your post.
(, Tue 24 Aug 2010, 17:00, Reply)
I wouldn't believe you to be capable of such a thing, you're not Chompy or Bert. Apologies for offending you
(, Tue 24 Aug 2010, 17:09, Reply)
it was only slight. One of the few things that annoys or upsets me is people who should know me better (not that you necessarily fall in that category) totally not being able to predict how I might act or respond to something.
(, Tue 24 Aug 2010, 17:12, Reply)
Then I retract my nice one. As it were.
(, Tue 24 Aug 2010, 17:14, Reply)
I would gaz you about it rather than having it out here, annoyingly your good opinion matters to me. I did wonder about that post as I entered it. That'll learn me
(, Tue 24 Aug 2010, 17:21, Reply)
given as he was poking fun at people who look for a meaning to life. As I understand it, he was an proponent of evolution and therefore pretty likely to be in the "there isn't one" camp.
(, Tue 24 Aug 2010, 16:44, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread