b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 892435 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

You don't have a leg to stand on though do you
you've just admitted it's your fault you got it wrong and therefore according to the terms and conditions which you are implicitly accepting by using the ticket, you have invalidated the ticket.
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:14, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
I'll invalidate your ticket
wait...
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:25, Reply)
yes
but i don't consider it to be invalid. on the face of the ticket, it was quite clear. if i had arrived after 10.10am, i could have seen their point - conceivably i could have had more than 24 hours.

if i weren't a lawyer, i'd just scratch off a new ticket and send them that with a letter saying "what's your problem?"

but my practising certificate is worth more than a £35 parking ticket, sadly.
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:26, Reply)
But you just said you scratched off two boxes in the hours column
which I'm almost certain will, according to the T&Cs, render the ticket invalid.

So really you ought to look at it as an expensive lesson in colouring between the lines.
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:31, Reply)
nope
also there is nothing in the Ts & Cs about scratching off 2 boxes invalidating a ticket. NOTHING. don't get me started on the legal ramifications of interpreting express and implied contractual clauses. but i will be really irritating the cunts at oxford city council parking department. it's the principle of the thing - that man/woman could clearly SEE i was not breaching anything. AND i was the only car on the street, so it's not as if i was even taking up spaces for residents. argh!
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:36, Reply)
I'm very surprised that the T&Cs are that badly worded then.
You should still try not to be such a clumsy arse in future though
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:38, Reply)
hungover and bleary eyed
would be more accurate.

yes, i intend to exploit their weakness. ha.
(, Mon 4 Oct 2010, 15:41, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1