b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 970594 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Just released
*******contains spoliers***************
************contains spoliers*******************
A new x-ray telescope has discovered a new object.
A Black Hole that is near (45 quadzillion miles away) to the Earth.
Apparently its only 19 years old.
*******contains spoliers***************
************contains spoliers*******************




I suppose on a scale of 1 - 10 its a 2 or 3.
I was hoping for sex starved invading aliens. (I'd probabloy shag one of the lizardy ones from "V", providing she kept her mask on, and didnt eat me.) But I am glad that its not just another new bit of flotsam floating around. And when is the new collider going to explode / make a new dimention? its boring just whizzing things around- glorified merri-go-round.
(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:00, 4 replies, latest was 15 years ago)
BLACK HOOOOLE!
nice
(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:00, Reply)

I'm not worried about this black hole as I remember when I was a kid, if it looks like it's going to be a problem all we have to do is throw three Shredded Wheat at it.

Job done.
(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:03, Reply)
That is utterly unexciting isn't it?

(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:01, Reply)
I think you'd be more interested in a 20 year old black hole, eh, old boy?
-wiggles arse-
(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:02, Reply)
Damn right baby.

(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:03, Reply)
How are you, bbz?

(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:06, Reply)
Fucking DYING, bbz.

(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:08, Reply)
I'm so sorry.
If you can get to Euston for about half nine I'll buy you a pint.
(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:09, Reply)
xxxx

(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:25, Reply)
I am serious, donchano.

(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:27, Reply)
Curse you and your gaping anus
this made me spit diet coke all over my keyboard.
(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:15, Reply)
If only this had come out literally 2 months ago
and I could have kept it at "19 year old"
(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:16, Reply)
Oh FFS!
bang goes the sexy alien theory
(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:01, Reply)
no valves either :-(

(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:02, Reply)
19 years old?
This is, in principle, fascinating. And if we've only just discovered it, then it can only be 19 light-years away from us. We could learn a lot from this.

Edit: And whilst we're on the subject of sexy alien females, has it not occurred to anybody that trying to shag one of them would be tantamount to bestiality?
(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:02, Reply)
I clearly do not understand the importance of this.

(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:03, Reply)
I relish this.

(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:05, Reply)
it is well documented that you are intellectually sub-par

(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:05, Reply)
It is even more well documented that you are pre-op.

(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:06, Reply)
better than being post-op like you

(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:06, Reply)
I could be mistaken
But I believe most of the black holes we know about are hundreds or thousands of light-years away, and therefore hundreds or thousands of years old by the time we see them. A black hole this young might still have enough crap drifting round it to tell us more about the way it formed and/or their behaviour in the earlier stages of their existence.


/boring reply is informative but boring. And somewhat dodgy of science.
(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:05, Reply)
What about that one in 'The Black Hole'?
You know, that documentary?
(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:06, Reply)
Erm...don't think I saw that.

(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:08, Reply)
It was a shit 70s Disney film.

(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:10, Reply)
Ah, that would be why.
(I tend to give up on Disney in their post-Jungle Book era)
(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:14, Reply)
I saw it in the cinema
when I was a child. It came out around the same time as Star Wars - the difference between them could not be more marked. It sucks massive balls.
(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:16, Reply)
It was on the same bill as Condor-Man.

(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:18, Reply)
Fuck me that was equally appalling.
I forget we're of a similar age. Hence you get all the Jimmy Hill/Deacon references.
(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:19, Reply)
was Condorman that terrible film with Gene Wilder?

(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:20, Reply)
I think it was with Frank Spencer
What's his name... Crawford?

I'll have a Google and see if Wilder was in it too.

EDIT: It was Michael Crawford and Oliver Reed!

And it was shit.
(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:22, Reply)
you are right
not sure why I thought it was Gene Wilder. No wonder that film is so shit if Michael Crawford is in it
(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:24, Reply)
Did you have a day in school Monts, which was the days after
'John's Not Mad' was first shown on the telly when EVERY KID claimed to have tourettes?

Fuckin' Nescafe.
(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:23, Reply)
Yes.
That documentary was a BIG EVENT.
(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:27, Reply)
not necessarily
could be that they've only just detected it and it was 19 years old when the light was emitted however many years ago it was
(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:04, Reply)
This thread is giving me Paul Hardcastle lolz.

(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:07, Reply)
at least it is good for something

(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:08, Reply)
Oh yes.
Sorry, having a bit of a slow one this afternoon. Either way, we could learn a lot from it.
(, Mon 15 Nov 2010, 18:08, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1