Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
not so that they could rape them just to offer violence, and be a bit nosy. The city was destroyed not just because of that, but becauses those same people had refused shelter to the angels earlier.
I understand you're not interested, but I'm still fucking giving you the information anyway
(, Thu 25 Nov 2010, 14:37, 1 reply, 15 years ago)
with know them being a common phrase in the bible for shagging.
(, Thu 25 Nov 2010, 14:39, Reply)
as opposed to several hundred other innocuous references. Also in the rare occasion it's used in a sexual manner, it doesn't have overtones of rape
(, Thu 25 Nov 2010, 14:41, Reply)
then I can't imagine the angels being very happy about it, which makes them as rapey as Chompy. FACT!
You Lose!
New argument please!
(, Thu 25 Nov 2010, 14:44, Reply)
it happens to the best.
Sodom may have partially been destroyed because of the rapiness of their inhabitants, but not because they threatened to rape angels. Otherwise there's an odd dearth of sources between 0th century- 9th century that associates Sodom with gayness
(, Thu 25 Nov 2010, 14:49, Reply)
Buying caramel digestives may still lead to firey brimstoney death
(, Thu 25 Nov 2010, 14:53, Reply)
So no. But yes, I know. I couldn't be bothered using the translation drop down box.
(, Thu 25 Nov 2010, 14:52, Reply)
by ridiculing your text translation choice
(, Thu 25 Nov 2010, 15:02, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread