What makes you angry? Get it off your chest so we can laugh at your impotent rage.
(, Thu 1 May 2008, 23:12)
« Go Back
No, no, no, no, NO!
It's 'would've' - the ' indicates the ha from have is missing, as in 'would have'.
Same goes with 'Should of' and 'Could of' (Though I've not seen those bastardised anywhere near as often).
GAH!!!!!!
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 5:30, 3 replies)
AARGHHHHHHH!!!
I totally agree!
Drives me mental!
Same as sumthing, nuthink, evryfink etc etc
Ugh
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 9:27, closed)
I totally agree with you, so much so that I had to read all the posts from the beginning to see if anyone else was driven insane by this particular cuntularity. You beat me to it.
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 13:01, closed)
The conditional used as follows:
"If he would have (of) got here sooner we would have (of) caught the train"
(, Fri 2 May 2008, 20:35, closed)
« Go Back