Pet Peeves
What makes you angry? Get it off your chest so we can laugh at your impotent rage.
( , Thu 1 May 2008, 23:12)
What makes you angry? Get it off your chest so we can laugh at your impotent rage.
( , Thu 1 May 2008, 23:12)
« Go Back
'Would of'
No, no, no, no, NO!
It's 'would've' - the ' indicates the ha from have is missing, as in 'would have'.
Same goes with 'Should of' and 'Could of' (Though I've not seen those bastardised anywhere near as often).
GAH!!!!!!
( , Fri 2 May 2008, 5:30, 3 replies)
No, no, no, no, NO!
It's 'would've' - the ' indicates the ha from have is missing, as in 'would have'.
Same goes with 'Should of' and 'Could of' (Though I've not seen those bastardised anywhere near as often).
GAH!!!!!!
( , Fri 2 May 2008, 5:30, 3 replies)
of of of of
AARGHHHHHHH!!!
I totally agree!
Drives me mental!
Same as sumthing, nuthink, evryfink etc etc
Ugh
( , Fri 2 May 2008, 9:27, closed)
AARGHHHHHHH!!!
I totally agree!
Drives me mental!
Same as sumthing, nuthink, evryfink etc etc
Ugh
( , Fri 2 May 2008, 9:27, closed)
Would of, could of, should of
I totally agree with you, so much so that I had to read all the posts from the beginning to see if anyone else was driven insane by this particular cuntularity. You beat me to it.
( , Fri 2 May 2008, 13:01, closed)
I totally agree with you, so much so that I had to read all the posts from the beginning to see if anyone else was driven insane by this particular cuntularity. You beat me to it.
( , Fri 2 May 2008, 13:01, closed)
Even worse (and related)
The conditional used as follows:
"If he would have (of) got here sooner we would have (of) caught the train"
( , Fri 2 May 2008, 20:35, closed)
The conditional used as follows:
"If he would have (of) got here sooner we would have (of) caught the train"
( , Fri 2 May 2008, 20:35, closed)
« Go Back