Not unless the OP had had prior spoken and written warnings.
In which case he wasn't sacked for 'upsetting a christian' it was being persistently awful at work.
( Amorous Badger NAKED BEA ARTHUR PHOTOS 4U, Sat 31 May 2014, 19:08, 2 replies)

Also: the b3ta user 'Nitrous' has me on 2.0.
Presumably because he fingers kids.
( Amorous Badger NAKED BEA ARTHUR PHOTOS 4U, Sat 31 May 2014, 19:08, closed)

me too ... never even heard of him
although I have heard he fingers kids
( Dr. Shambolic je suis charlie, Sat 31 May 2014, 20:08, closed)

I too, have no idea of who he, Nitrous, is, just that he fingers kids.

( Amorous Badger NAKED BEA ARTHUR PHOTOS 4U, Sat 31 May 2014, 21:43, closed)

I believe the fact that the two of you have clearly logged out and then back in again in order to read his posts and comment on them
says more about your needy obsessions than it does about his wish not to interact with you.
(mankwhistle, Sun 1 Jun 2014, 0:37, closed)

I was just mildly curious having noted that the story listed 7 replies but I could see 2.
Given that I can recall no interaction whatsoever with this user I can only conclude that he fingers kids.
( Amorous Badger NAKED BEA ARTHUR PHOTOS 4U, Sun 1 Jun 2014, 1:04, closed)

Well, let's be honest for a moment shall we?
You couldn't stand the fact that someone *might* say something about you with out your knowledge so you had to logout to read Nitrous's posts. Then, because you're a shit-stirrer you had to log back in to make a post. And because you're a troll you had to make a post that *if* Nitrous read it would be sure to elicit a response. Did I miss anything?
At best you're a vain, shit-stirring troll. At worst - you're so obsessed with this site and how you are perceived on it you'll try to redirect your obsession by making a list of links from this site that [you think] make other people look bad. Oh.
Wait...
(mankwhistle, Sun 1 Jun 2014, 2:34, closed)

I think you probably need a nice dip in your saltwater pool to cool off a bit.

( Amorous Badger NAKED BEA ARTHUR PHOTOS 4U, Sun 1 Jun 2014, 14:37, closed)

Only been here 12 days, no way is that long enough to fill a 40,000 litre pool with tears.
However, mankwhistle has a point.
( d.r._and_quinch when will you be famous?, Sun 1 Jun 2014, 18:31, closed)

Is it not fair, that if you know a post has more replies than you can see
That you log out to find out what you're missing? I think if the system is shit enough to flag that up, it's inevitable.
Plus if anyone has me on ignore, it's obviously because they're a prick. After all, I'm fucking wonderful.
( mictoboy shitting in your cunt since, Mon 2 Jun 2014, 7:03, closed)

totes putting you on ignore now

( Dr. Shambolic je suis charlie, Mon 2 Jun 2014, 8:03, closed)

You appear to be irked about someone else's disagreement on the internet.
I recommend a nice glass of refreshing whole milk, and a delicious chococcino muffin, both available from Marks and Spencer.
(eViLegion Chief Commissioner of the Scottish Lunacy Board, Mon 2 Jun 2014, 11:13, closed)

typical jew

( Dr. Shambolic je suis charlie, Mon 2 Jun 2014, 12:45, closed)

pipe down, fairholme
nobody needs to log in and out
Ignore 2.0 is broken. I even offered to fix it a year or more ago but the fingers were too deep in the dogs
( Dr. Shambolic je suis charlie, Sun 1 Jun 2014, 10:18, closed)

Fix?
By ignoring the cookies?

Well done you.
Like anyone here would trust you to "fix" something here. You keep wishing for that mod spot.
;]
(mankwhistle, Sun 1 Jun 2014, 10:24, closed)

FFS no
don't get it corrected, you terrible excuse for a dog turd
( rachelswipe with a fork, Mon 2 Jun 2014, 12:30, closed)

I was just going to make it so that everybody had you on ignore by default.

( Dr. Shambolic je suis charlie, Mon 2 Jun 2014, 12:45, closed)

who said that?

( rachelswipe with a fork, Mon 2 Jun 2014, 15:05, closed)

Yeah, but like everything else in the world, it's religious people's fault.

(Plague Hedgehog 'posting crap', Sat 31 May 2014, 21:09, closed)