Top Tips
Got a great tip? Share it with us. You know, stuff like "Prevent sneezing by pressing you index finger firmly between your nose and your upper lip."
( , Wed 29 Nov 2006, 16:33)
Got a great tip? Share it with us. You know, stuff like "Prevent sneezing by pressing you index finger firmly between your nose and your upper lip."
( , Wed 29 Nov 2006, 16:33)
« Go Back
Hmm.
There was an article on the BBC yesterday about some boffins who have invented a new type of atomic clock, that is accurate to within 1 second every 300 million years.
This they say will replace the current technology which is only accurate to within 1 second every 100 million years.
My only thought was - how much do these things cost? I would be tempted to spend the money on something else, and put up with the old one, which is a disastrously sloppy 1/2.80e-16 out, rather than the snappy new one at 1/9.33e-17.
( , Thu 11 Jul 2013, 11:21, Reply)
There was an article on the BBC yesterday about some boffins who have invented a new type of atomic clock, that is accurate to within 1 second every 300 million years.
This they say will replace the current technology which is only accurate to within 1 second every 100 million years.
My only thought was - how much do these things cost? I would be tempted to spend the money on something else, and put up with the old one, which is a disastrously sloppy 1/2.80e-16 out, rather than the snappy new one at 1/9.33e-17.
( , Thu 11 Jul 2013, 11:21, Reply)
Things are getting better, faster and more accurate.
It's progress.
Say "Thank you".
( , Thu 11 Jul 2013, 12:33, Reply)
It's progress.
Say "Thank you".
( , Thu 11 Jul 2013, 12:33, Reply)
But surely you wouldn't want
a clock that goes faster, would you?
( , Thu 11 Jul 2013, 13:27, Reply)
a clock that goes faster, would you?
( , Thu 11 Jul 2013, 13:27, Reply)
Well clearly you do.
Why - your atomic clock, at losing a second every 100,000,000 years is only a third as accurate as mine, which only loses a second every 300,000,000 years!
( , Thu 11 Jul 2013, 13:37, Reply)
Why - your atomic clock, at losing a second every 100,000,000 years is only a third as accurate as mine, which only loses a second every 300,000,000 years!
( , Thu 11 Jul 2013, 13:37, Reply)
How about an atomic wrist watch?
www.theregister.co.uk/2013/05/01/hoptroff_shows_first_atomic_watch_movement/
( , Thu 11 Jul 2013, 18:50, Reply)
www.theregister.co.uk/2013/05/01/hoptroff_shows_first_atomic_watch_movement/
( , Thu 11 Jul 2013, 18:50, Reply)
The problem is
that we both have one, and then I walk across the room, they'd be out of sync.
( , Tue 16 Jul 2013, 12:17, Reply)
that we both have one, and then I walk across the room, they'd be out of sync.
( , Tue 16 Jul 2013, 12:17, Reply)
« Go Back