The B3TA Detective Agency
Universalpsykopath tugs our coat and says: Tell us about your feats of deduction and the little mysteries you've solved. Alternatively, tell us about the simple, everyday things that mystified you for far too long.
( , Thu 13 Oct 2011, 12:52)
Universalpsykopath tugs our coat and says: Tell us about your feats of deduction and the little mysteries you've solved. Alternatively, tell us about the simple, everyday things that mystified you for far too long.
( , Thu 13 Oct 2011, 12:52)
« Go Back
why the fuck
do we have to lose those dear to us? i seriousy doubt anyone can answer this without severe cold-hearted logic.
( , Fri 14 Oct 2011, 21:48, 14 replies)
do we have to lose those dear to us? i seriousy doubt anyone can answer this without severe cold-hearted logic.
( , Fri 14 Oct 2011, 21:48, 14 replies)
You're right, I can't think of anything beyond pointless aphorisms, trite clichés, or as you say, cold-hearted logic.
Well apart from this.
We don't actually lose them, per se. Who and what we are, both our bodies and what makes us... us becomes a part of everything. Entropy, innit?
And there is a school of thought saying a person is never truly dead until all the ripples of everything they did has petered out. So in that sense, the first humans who evolved are still with us.
( , Fri 14 Oct 2011, 21:57, closed)
Well apart from this.
We don't actually lose them, per se. Who and what we are, both our bodies and what makes us... us becomes a part of everything. Entropy, innit?
And there is a school of thought saying a person is never truly dead until all the ripples of everything they did has petered out. So in that sense, the first humans who evolved are still with us.
( , Fri 14 Oct 2011, 21:57, closed)
I've got one going out and one coming in at the moment. Feels a bit Lion King-y, in its Circle of Lifeness. Nice as that is, I would swap in a heartbeat.
( , Fri 14 Oct 2011, 22:01, closed)
Its not that you lose them, its that they hide from you because youre a mean bully.
( , Fri 14 Oct 2011, 23:26, closed)
Because everyone dies.
My get out clause here is that it doesn't seem cold-hearted to me, because I'm not grieving. And am an emotionless robot.
( , Fri 14 Oct 2011, 23:37, closed)
My get out clause here is that it doesn't seem cold-hearted to me, because I'm not grieving. And am an emotionless robot.
( , Fri 14 Oct 2011, 23:37, closed)
If they didn't go crashing into bikers all the time
'twould be a less common occurrence.
( , Sat 15 Oct 2011, 7:44, closed)
'twould be a less common occurrence.
( , Sat 15 Oct 2011, 7:44, closed)
Because otherwise it would be like the most recent series of Torchwood, and that was shit.
( , Sat 15 Oct 2011, 7:46, closed)
( , Sat 15 Oct 2011, 7:46, closed)
And when we lose them, they're always in the last place we look.
( , Sat 15 Oct 2011, 14:41, closed)
( , Sat 15 Oct 2011, 14:41, closed)
Well of course they are!
Once you find them, you don't keep looking, do you?
( , Wed 19 Oct 2011, 19:37, closed)
Once you find them, you don't keep looking, do you?
( , Wed 19 Oct 2011, 19:37, closed)
Either ...
you lose them or they lose you. Which would you rather it be?
( , Sun 16 Oct 2011, 1:29, closed)
you lose them or they lose you. Which would you rather it be?
( , Sun 16 Oct 2011, 1:29, closed)
If there was not chance of losing them,
they wouldn't be so dear to us, would they?
( , Wed 19 Oct 2011, 19:37, closed)
they wouldn't be so dear to us, would they?
( , Wed 19 Oct 2011, 19:37, closed)
« Go Back