Noirmally I have no problem
with the more outrageous posts as they are so over the top that they are funny or the news items contain something that could be amusing or ironic. This is just extremist idiots attacking defensless people so I have trouble finding any humour in the report.
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 11:49, archived)
with the more outrageous posts as they are so over the top that they are funny or the news items contain something that could be amusing or ironic. This is just extremist idiots attacking defensless people so I have trouble finding any humour in the report.
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 11:49, archived)
I dont see how its controversial
I do see, however, that you are a nancy boy:)
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 12:00, archived)
I do see, however, that you are a nancy boy:)
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 12:00, archived)
they aren't defenceless
they could easily have defended themselves using their handbags, makeup and stillettos
the women however would have been in trouble, I agree ...
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 11:54, archived)
they could easily have defended themselves using their handbags, makeup and stillettos
the women however would have been in trouble, I agree ...
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 11:54, archived)
It angered me
as I could imagine that being myself or my friends being stabbed.
However, I still managed to make a silly post down there.
I don't even know what I was trying to say, so please just dismiss this post as the confused rambling of someone who should be in bed.
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 11:55, archived)
as I could imagine that being myself or my friends being stabbed.
However, I still managed to make a silly post down there.
I don't even know what I was trying to say, so please just dismiss this post as the confused rambling of someone who should be in bed.
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 11:55, archived)
I apologise for pointing out the insanity of attacking someone
For religious reasons...
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 11:57, archived)
For religious reasons...
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 11:57, archived)
I'm sorry, must be my time of the month
just the way you presented it did not point this out.
Of course I still love you. *bums*
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 11:59, archived)
just the way you presented it did not point this out.
Of course I still love you. *bums*
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 11:59, archived)
Not knowing anything about Jews
except some of them wore funny hats and dreadlocks, I was on a plane to Israel.
One of the funny hatted ones got his case out the overhead locker nearly taking my head off, then stood on my foot. I said in a very loud annoyed voice 'Hey! That's my foot you're standing on'. (I might have used different words)
He looked at me in disbelief as the whole plane went quiet and stared at this ignorant (blonde so I stuck out a mile) foerigner who dared to question a foul smelling sweaty weirdo that they obviously held in high esteem. I nearly came under attack for religous reasons.
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 12:00, archived)
except some of them wore funny hats and dreadlocks, I was on a plane to Israel.
One of the funny hatted ones got his case out the overhead locker nearly taking my head off, then stood on my foot. I said in a very loud annoyed voice 'Hey! That's my foot you're standing on'. (I might have used different words)
He looked at me in disbelief as the whole plane went quiet and stared at this ignorant (blonde so I stuck out a mile) foerigner who dared to question a foul smelling sweaty weirdo that they obviously held in high esteem. I nearly came under attack for religous reasons.
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 12:00, archived)
You didn't mean to point out the insanity of attacking someone for religious reasons though, did you?
You just wanted to make some shitty jokeoids about yids and poofs.
Have you tried going to a BNP meeting? Your sense of humour would fit in perfectly.
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 12:01, archived)
You just wanted to make some shitty jokeoids about yids and poofs.
Have you tried going to a BNP meeting? Your sense of humour would fit in perfectly.
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 12:01, archived)
Hang on
So the structure looks a bit like this:
- Mykey makes a "controversial" comment, probably involving terms of racial, heterosexist or class abuse
- Someone else points out that this is in fact not funny or clever
-Mykey responds with crude heterosexist abuse impugning the masculinity* of the previous poster
Hmmp.
*not that to claim that someone is homosexual is to impugn their masculinity in anthing but the mind of fuckwits.
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 12:07, archived)
So the structure looks a bit like this:
- Mykey makes a "controversial" comment, probably involving terms of racial, heterosexist or class abuse
- Someone else points out that this is in fact not funny or clever
-Mykey responds with crude heterosexist abuse impugning the masculinity* of the previous poster
Hmmp.
*not that to claim that someone is homosexual is to impugn their masculinity in anthing but the mind of fuckwits.
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 12:07, archived)
Poof.
I tried really hard not to post this. But the temptation was too great in the end.
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 12:09, archived)
I tried really hard not to post this. But the temptation was too great in the end.
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 12:09, archived)
You really should go here:
www.4rthur.com
Its right up your alley
This is only the internet my friend, do try to take it all a little less seriously
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 12:10, archived)
www.4rthur.com
Its right up your alley
This is only the internet my friend, do try to take it all a little less seriously
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 12:10, archived)
So
they don't find hatespeech badly disguised as hilarious cutting edge humour hilarious there?
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 12:17, archived)
they don't find hatespeech badly disguised as hilarious cutting edge humour hilarious there?
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 12:17, archived)
You forgot
- Mykey tries to weasel his way out of it by pretending the reason he posted the link in the first place was to draw attention to the these poor victims of dogmatic hatred.
Odious.
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 12:14, archived)
- Mykey tries to weasel his way out of it by pretending the reason he posted the link in the first place was to draw attention to the these poor victims of dogmatic hatred.
Odious.
( , Mon 4 Jul 2005, 12:14, archived)