You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Talk » Message 6182712 (Thread)

That's the general feeling.
Would bogus official like to reply to this post?
Come along now.
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:04, archived)
Oh, are you holding out a torch hoping he'll pop along?
Good for you.
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:10, archived)
No, see Bogus Official's latest strategy appears to be posting one message in a JMG thread roughly around 11pm each night calling me names.
He never seems to return after this, as I fear he thumps out a scathing remark on the internet. Then slams shut his browser.
That'll show me.
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:12, archived)
He probably goes to bed at some point,
not like you lot, with your Red Bull drips that enable you to stay up accumulating Magic Points on World of Witchcraft round the clock.
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:14, archived)
Now he might look back at this in the morning in some kind of "search for your username" escapade Baldmonkey does.
I'd like to make it PERFECTLY CLEAR to Mr. Official that I did NOT make the above comment.

That's BOGUS, OFFICIAL.
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:15, archived)
I want to go to bed

(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:16, archived)
Me too,
but I have to wait for a SMART long self-test to complete on a new 500Gb HDD.
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:25, archived)
What time did you start that off?

(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:26, archived)
about half an hour ago.
Bad foresight, really. Typical of me.
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:27, archived)
Night time is always a bad time to start that kind of thing.
It always seems to take an age.
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:28, archived)
Why would you do that? Do you suspect a fault?

(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:28, archived)
I always suspect a fault on a new HDD.
Better safe than sorry.
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:29, archived)
It'd be quicker to run something like the SiSoft SANDRA hard drive performance test.
You could run it at least 5 times and still be quicker than the long SMART test. It would also show up failures that might otherwise take a few days of use to surface. It also lists the SMART data, so you can see if you're getting any bad sectors between runs.
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:44, archived)
Can you get that for Linux?

(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:47, archived)
Probably not.
You must surely have a Windows box sat about somewhere though?
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:53, archived)
It seems odd that you reference this on a regular basis.
I'd have thought you'd take it as another someone on an internet message board and let it slie like water off a ducks back.
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:16, archived)
When have I made this very claim before?
:(
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:17, archived)
Aren't you two supposed to be older and therefore I'd hope WISER than myself?
I seriously think I'm unflappable on the issue.
My case here is solid.

I'm much better than you people.
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:18, archived)
I never said you made that claim, more that you reference that Bogus Official will have a go at you.

(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:19, archived)
..and I'm right.
I honestly think we might have to go back to drawings and colouring in on this page.
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:22, archived)
When someone posts the Picard ASCII,
the board should detect it, and render it in full colour.
Still as ascii, mind. But COLOUR ascii.
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:23, archived)
Yes, but only for me.
Or maybe it can automatically link to some topless women, or something.
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:24, archived)
like, just a pair of legs?

(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:26, archived)
Sexy legs.

(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:28, archived)
Slightly away from the point as was illustrating but nevermind.
You carry on.
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:25, archived)
But nevertheless, back on the main topic here.
Me.
Me, me, me, me, me..
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:26, archived)

www.b3ta.com/search/posts/9708?q=bogus+official
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:19, archived)
6 years, 14 posts.
www.b3ta.com/search/posts/41519?q=JMG

Fifty.
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:21, archived)
That's proof positive.
I certainly won't attempt to flap you on the issue.
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:22, archived)
I admit I am incredibly popular, and some remarks may be simply because I'm so swell.

(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:24, archived)
Gee,
darn.
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:24, archived)
It's a good job you aren't taking any of this seriously.

(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:24, archived)
It is, like.
How many times have you met Bogus Official?
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:25, archived)
Just once.

(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:26, archived)
I'd like to think you aren't taking this seriously on his behalf.
You've only met him once.
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:28, archived)
I'm taking nothing seriously.
It would be a silly thing to do.
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:29, archived)
Excellent post!

(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:30, archived)
I like to think that there are a whole host of scientists
measuring how fast water runs off a duck's back.
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:19, archived)
they just run water over a witch's back,
and assume it's the same.
(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:20, archived)
Those clever buggers.

(, Fri 29 May 2009, 0:21, archived)