You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Talk » Message 6193290

I watched 2001: A Space Odyssey last night.
I'm quite glad they got their predictions wrong. 5 minutes of no sound or vision, 10 minutes of swirly colours and 45 minutes of model spaceships spinning to Blue Danube isn't how I spent my time in 2001. It'd be better described as 1965: A Spinning Camera Trip featuring Women With Bags on their Swedes'

What do you hope for in Futureworld? Or Future/Talk, if you're not going to leave the house.
(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:46, archived)
What about the other 14 hours of the film?

(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:47, archived)
Oh yeah, he spent it arguing with a computer that nobody had thought to put a manual override switch on.
Fuckwits.
(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:48, archived)
I liked that bit. I also liked the way
it portayed space during the spacewalk. I liked Hal too.
(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:51, archived)
That was a really good concept and well acted story, culminating in a deliberately
unclear and unexplained ending (as it apparently misses out a lot from the book, just to confuse you) and more spinning ships.
(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:49, archived)
It was all a bit shit, really.
Let's be honest.
I've never been able to watch it all in one go because it's just so bloody tedious.
(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:51, archived)
Put it this way. With an old video of it and a pair of scissors, you could
make a really good 45 minute film.
(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:52, archived)
I think it's brilliant.

(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:54, archived)
You're really dull though.

(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:55, archived)
You're just not clever enough.

(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:55, archived)
That's a lie.
I just have taste.
(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:56, archived)
The film smells strongly of the Emperor's New Clothes in parts.

(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:58, archived)
This is the least surprising post I'll see here all week.

(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:55, archived)
the film wasn't of the book,
in fact both the book and the film were made in parallel, so neither one is more "correct". But the book obviously does have more detail in it.
(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:54, archived)
Flying cars

(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:47, archived)
Clampers will be fucked.
This is a good idea.
(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:50, archived)
I'd hope the future would be like
this
(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:49, archived)
I hope that the future has less you.

(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:51, archived)
More Druid!

(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:52, archived)

Druid Cuffbert
(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:52, archived)

ff nt
(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:52, archived)
Oh my.

(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:53, archived)
hopefully cures for cancer, aids, and all those other nasty diseases

(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:52, archived)
Ooh, careful... The BNP won't like that at ALL.

(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:53, archived)
not having to take two bottles to the shower

(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:53, archived)
I see what you did there.
I actually would like to see hair growth pills. It'd be cracking to be able to change your hair length quickly both ways.
(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:55, archived)
Drink the scotch without the tonic?
Lofty goal, there, man.
(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:55, archived)
BABIES.
Actually I am hoping for a nice new house with a large garden, big kitchen and plenty of lovely space for friends to stay in.

Then babies.
(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:54, archived)
I have a baby that you can have.

(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:55, archived)
He'll sleep soon enough.
Enjoy this whilst it lasts. They grow up too fast.
(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:55, archived)
I can start her off with some teens to break her in

(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:56, archived)
job job job job
and potato salad.
(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:56, archived)
Wealth and riches and everybody loving me.
Or else.
(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:58, archived)
A nice part time job, to escape Northampton, and to have a place where we can have pets.

(, Tue 2 Jun 2009, 19:59, archived)