You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Talk » Message 6198270 (Thread)

I won't be voting Conservative
an insidious cunt's still a cunt.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 14:41, archived)
The implication being that any Conservative politician is an insidious cunt?

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 14:44, archived)
Not any, just quite a few.
in my humble, anyway. Easy Tarquin, you know your boys have already won.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 14:44, archived)
Are they insidious cunts becuase they are Conservative politicians or despite being Conservative politicians?
Are there more insidious cunts in the Conservative party than other political parties?
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 14:47, archived)
Christ, this is like the pissed Glaswegian at the bar that mishears someone say Celtic are shit.
Not due to or despite party, but that's the feeling I get about a lot of them at the moment. Lovely, soothing, comforting Conservatives that really care about the proles.

To be honest, I didn't realise I was going to be interrogated.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 14:48, archived)
I just don't understand what you meant by
I won't be voting Conservative
an insidious cunt's still a cunt.

You won't vote for a political party because it has insidious cunts in it?
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 14:51, archived)
No, I won't vote for them because I don't agree with a lot of their policies
that was just an aside. It's nice to know you give so much of a shit, though.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 14:52, archived)
Most of the Tory vote comes from proles

They'd never get in otherwise
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 14:51, archived)
I actually would, if they had any chance of winning in my constituency.
I want labour to go away. Some say better the devil you know, but I reckon no devil could be worse than this cunt, insidious or otherwise.
The least we can hope for is a semi-competent cunt, I reckon.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 14:45, archived)
I think, to be honest, even if they came up with a lot of policies I agreed with
I'd still not. Silly, I know, but it's The Conservatives.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 14:47, archived)
They're the BADDIES
they're ON THE OTHER SIDE

This is why democracy isn't what it should be.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 14:48, archived)
I read that as "BADDIELS"
Fuck voting for that fat oily cunt.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 14:52, archived)
I dont think putting a party in italics makes them bad

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 14:49, archived)
You, personally,
are the entirety of everything that is bad about politics. If someone killed you the world would probably be awesome.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 14:49, archived)
steady on there

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 14:49, archived)
YER I'LL FIGHT THERLOTTAYERS.

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 14:52, archived)
You wear a hat indoors, shut up.

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 14:51, archived)
Stop oppressing me,
you fascist.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 14:53, archived)
Stop judging me, you poser.

(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 14:53, archived)
i concur, i'd like to see labour out
but that really doesn't necessitate my voting for someone else i don't believe in
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 14:49, archived)
this is a commonly shared view
from what I have found recently. no one wants to vote labour, they all think lib dems are a bit of a waste of a vote at the moment, and no one actually wants to vote conservative.

what's left? UKIP. BNP.

great
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 15:05, archived)
I don't think the lib dems are a waste of time
it's only because everyone else has too little vision to see an England without Labour or the cons at the helm that they think that.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 15:06, archived)
it was the general feeling I got
I can see them being in opposition come the general election which would be something at least.
would it really make that much difference to have the Lib dems at the helm? Frankly, I don't have the vision to see that it would. I'd like to give it a try though.
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 15:12, archived)
i don't quite get the "they won't win, so vote for someone you don't like because they're better than someone else you don't like" line
even if one has to live with first-past-the-post voting, it's still not the option i'd pick
(, Thu 4 Jun 2009, 15:37, archived)