b3ta.com talk
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Talk » Message 6270017

I'm going to see a film tonight, and we have the option of normal cinema or IMAX
Is IMAX worth paying the extra for over a good, big normal screen, or is it distracting?

The film is Transformers 2, in case you wish to snort derisorily and try to recommend something you've seen and think is better.
(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:37, archived)
Depends where you sit.
I sat on the front row of the IMAX for Star Trek and it was a very peculiar experience.

I would recommend watching it from the middle.
(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:38, archived)
Also, I've already made my thoughts on Transformers 2 perfectly clear.

(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:39, archived)

www.b3ta.com/talk/6239430
(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:39, archived)
What are your opinions on the back?

(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:39, archived)
he loves it from behind

(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:40, archived)
P
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
T
(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:41, archived)
Noted.

(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:39, archived)
The fact that you chose to sit at the front proves you are head wrong.
Mid to back is clearly the best seating area, the superiour acoustics in combination with not having to strain your neck for the length of the film makes it a far more enjoyable experience.
(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:42, archived)
Quite clearly this is truth.

(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:48, archived)
why do they even have seats at the front in cinemas?

(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 13:00, archived)
even if they put the first row a mile away from the screen
it would still be the front.
(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 13:31, archived)
1. I have never been to an IMAX
B. It's not as good as the first one, and I got confused as to which were the good robots and which were the bad ones. Megan Fox though provides two very very good reasons to see the film.
(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:38, archived)
I'm going to watch Public Enemies.
I mentioned it a bit further down the page. I've never seen an IMAX film.
(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:39, archived)
don't sit at the front of the cinema
I saw 300 on IMAX in the front row, spent 2 hours looking up actors' noses

and the parallax makes it look like they have HUGE chins. Sit near the back.
(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:39, archived)
also, this
CPW etc lololbzzz
(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:40, archived)
Ha ha!

(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:45, archived)
How much extra is it?
Because I saw The Dark Knight in IMAX, and the difference wasn't overly astounding.
(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:39, archived)
£7.95 vs £5.90

(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:42, archived)
I'd just pay the normal price.
But then again, I'm cheap.
(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:43, archived)
Me too, thats why I wanted to know if there was added value.

(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:46, archived)
Only been to one IMAX in my life
sitting near the front gives you motion sickness
(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:41, archived)
first time I went was to see an IMAX 3D demonstration
now that was vomit-inducing
(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:43, archived)
It was that docu-drama about Shackleton I saw
the opening scene of the helecopter was like being in an aircraft simulator
(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:44, archived)
i saw batman at the imax and i fucking loved it
pay out you tight tosser
(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:44, archived)
Money dosn't grow on trees,.
Not at any of my 3 houses, anyway ;)
(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:45, archived)
haha £2.05
jog on
(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:47, archived)
For some people £2.05 is the difference between eating for a couple of days and going hungry

(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:51, archived)
i doubt those people would be debating the cinema or imax

(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:53, archived)
A rich man once told me 'you don't get rich by giving it away'. £2.05 is a pint.

(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:51, archived)
so fuck off transformers and go get wankered
go on, give me another one. i bet the answer is "chips"
(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:54, archived)
people who won't spend a bit more money to get better stuff are shitcunts

(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 12:57, archived)

who won't spend a bit more money to get better stuff
(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 13:00, archived)
that too

(, Thu 2 Jul 2009, 13:01, archived)