
Wind power : only works when wind blows, infuriates NIMBY crowd, heavily subsidised. Sort of works.
Fossil fuels : produces that CO2 stuff that's mucking up the weather. But digging up British coal would be pretty sweet for the UK economy.
Solar power : In the UK? You're kidding, right?
Wave/Tidal power : underfunded, has potential.
Harnessing hot air from the Houses of Parliament : Only works when in session.
( ,
Thu 17 Jun 2010, 14:41,
archived)
Fossil fuels : produces that CO2 stuff that's mucking up the weather. But digging up British coal would be pretty sweet for the UK economy.
Solar power : In the UK? You're kidding, right?
Wave/Tidal power : underfunded, has potential.
Harnessing hot air from the Houses of Parliament : Only works when in session.

Quite a long way (and billions of quid) away though. How easy is it to extract Deuterium/Tritium from water? Would it be cost-effective?
( ,
Thu 17 Jun 2010, 14:46,
archived)

Beaming power down as microwaves.
( ,
Thu 17 Jun 2010, 14:46,
archived)

preparing the fuel is also a sad part of nuclear power. Oh and the tiny issue with possible disasters.
It still has my vote for only viable option.
[/serious]
( ,
Thu 17 Jun 2010, 14:46,
archived)
It still has my vote for only viable option.
[/serious]

Until something better gets developed it might be the lesser of all the evils. And they'd better hurry up before we have an energy crisis or something.
( ,
Thu 17 Jun 2010, 14:49,
archived)

even if that were true, that doesn't necessarily make it acceptable. Perhaps it just implies that we need to come up with more options.
( ,
Thu 17 Jun 2010, 14:50,
archived)

only option to me personally, in my view.
For all of these the main thing to realize is that they're built and run by whoever does it the cheapest.
( ,
Thu 17 Jun 2010, 14:59,
archived)
For all of these the main thing to realize is that they're built and run by whoever does it the cheapest.

there's enough sunny space in deserts like the sahara, only tranporting the harnessed power to northern europe will be a bit tricky, but not unsolveable (high voltage power lines, hydrogen, advanced batteries...)
( ,
Thu 17 Jun 2010, 14:52,
archived)

It could be a huge boost to African development, too.
There could be a DC supergrid, connecting solar arrays in North Africa, wind and tide power off the British Isles, geothermal energy from iceland, nuclear from Russia, waterfall turbine thingies from Norway... All parts of the grid would contribute at different times, and all would have access to the lot.
I like this idea a lot.
( ,
Thu 17 Jun 2010, 14:55,
archived)
There could be a DC supergrid, connecting solar arrays in North Africa, wind and tide power off the British Isles, geothermal energy from iceland, nuclear from Russia, waterfall turbine thingies from Norway... All parts of the grid would contribute at different times, and all would have access to the lot.
I like this idea a lot.

Giving the UK cheap power would be a nice gesture.
This is quite informative - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HVDC#Renewable_electricity_superhighways
( ,
Thu 17 Jun 2010, 15:16,
archived)
This is quite informative - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HVDC#Renewable_electricity_superhighways

Solar power in the UK has potential, I reckon. You don't need much direct light, after all. Even in winter, there ought to be enough daylight to make a big difference, technology pending.
Wind power: beautiful. I'd much rather watch a field of turbines than a DRAX power station.
But... yeah.
I'd add to the list GM algae farms producing biofuels, and geothermal heat exchange.
EDIT: Ooooh, and vacuum energy. Sod the fact that it's merely hypothetical and I'm having trouble keeping sci-fi from reality. It's still infinite.
( ,
Thu 17 Jun 2010, 14:52,
archived)
Wind power: beautiful. I'd much rather watch a field of turbines than a DRAX power station.
But... yeah.
I'd add to the list GM algae farms producing biofuels, and geothermal heat exchange.
EDIT: Ooooh, and vacuum energy. Sod the fact that it's merely hypothetical and I'm having trouble keeping sci-fi from reality. It's still infinite.


The planet's core is in no danger of solidifying for as long as humanity's around.
( ,
Thu 17 Jun 2010, 14:56,
archived)


But there'd be fewer volcanic ash clouds, so, y'know, swings and roundabouts...
:)
( ,
Thu 17 Jun 2010, 15:02,
archived)
:)

The amount of energy extracted is incredibly tiny compared to how much is down there.
( ,
Thu 17 Jun 2010, 15:17,
archived)

It mostly comes from decaying radioactive elements. I don't think the Earth is doing anything useful with it.
( ,
Thu 17 Jun 2010, 16:05,
archived)

And anyone who denies this is a boring nay-sayer with a dessicated soul, or summink.
( ,
Thu 17 Jun 2010, 15:03,
archived)

but it's pricey, so 20-30% efficiency for the on-land ones is apparently cool with the government, because they don't have to spend much money in order to look greener.
( ,
Thu 17 Jun 2010, 15:10,
archived)

skeptoid.com/episodes/4092
it's a nice run down of the basic facts as opposed to stuff you learned from the simpsons
( ,
Sun 20 Jun 2010, 2:13,
archived)
it's a nice run down of the basic facts as opposed to stuff you learned from the simpsons