b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 10423753 (Thread)

# quite a long time ago ...


Tis his birthday today, apparently; he's 2555 years old.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 13:40, archived)
# I need to know specifically how long ago
before I can woo this or yay it... at the moment I'm only prepared to go as far as to say I like it and I found it hard to masturbate to
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 13:42, archived)
# you saying seeing that little bit of one pixel nipple didn't get you going immediately?
you fucking disgust me!
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 13:43, archived)
# now your disgust is something I find it easy to masturbate to
...
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 13:45, archived)
# Now I'm masturbating to you masturbating to his disgust
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 13:55, archived)
# I've decided that you can be my moral compass
is it wrong to steal internet from the person next door if they're too retarded to have a proper password?
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 13:59, archived)
# nope
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:03, archived)
# I can promise to be an exceptional moral compass.
Really? Fucking idiots! Not only should you steal their internet you should piss in their garden as often as possible.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:03, archived)
# ... okay, good start
... next, they have a netowrked printer... how much of their internet should I use before I get it to print off some really offensive gay porn?
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:05, archived)
# Hahahaha
I'd go for a whole kilobyte.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:07, archived)
# why are you not onto your second picture already?
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:08, archived)
# Because god hates me.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:11, archived)
# it was suppose to be a reply to Prof.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:50, archived)
# What's offensive about gay porn, are you some sort of homophobe?
Is the argument you should use if they challenge you.

Also, who lives there? Is it a couple? If so, you could engender some sort of marital spat with your porn printing leaving you free to make a move on the partner of your choice.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:08, archived)
# You are Peter Mandleson
AICMFP.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:10, archived)
# Chance would be a fine thing
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:14, archived)
# By "in their garden", Wasp Box means, of course
"all over their washing".
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:06, archived)
# they do have a washing line in their garden
I'm glad I brough all of this up, it's clear what I have to do now
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:07, archived)
# If you're lucky
you may be able to piss on their washing from the privacy of your own upstaris room.

edit/ but I wouldn't take moral guidance from Vagabond, he's a right wrong 'un
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:09, archived)
#
's a right likes to give it up the
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:10, archived)
#
to give
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:11, archived)
# Racist.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:12, archived)
# Homophobe!
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:13, archived)
# Only because you're so gay.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:14, archived)
# I can be whatever you want me to be darling

/ac
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:15, archived)
# okay
I should probably take notes... I might need to go into their garden with a tape measure to figure out if I can piss on their washing from my house
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:11, archived)
# You shouldn't go to too much trouble
that'd just be plain wrong
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:12, archived)
# Not to mention a bit weird.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:14, archived)
# I think he's some sort of stalker
I'm not sure I want to be his moral compass after all
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:15, archived)
# These days it's referred to as a "moral sat nav" anyway.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:18, archived)
# but he/she/it is showing a tit!
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 13:44, archived)
# I'm so desensitised that I need at least 3 tits in a picture
to get even the slightest incling of a rumbling out of the chap
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 13:50, archived)
# I can't believe it's not Buddha
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 13:43, archived)
# this is much better than my reply
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 13:44, archived)
# Nowzen nowzen
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:09, archived)
# this is fantastic
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:18, archived)
# i second that!
*clicks*
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 16:13, archived)
# Yay
"Spiritualism" trumps science every time, because you can just make up whatever answer you like.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 13:48, archived)
# ommmMMMMM figs!
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 13:49, archived)
# in roman times Figs were a metaphore for a woman's external genitalia
similar to how we use the term kebab today...
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 13:51, archived)
# phwoar!
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 13:53, archived)
# then it's lucky
Romans hadn't been invented, or he would have found it even harder while trying to meditate.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:12, archived)
# 'harder'
Now I want Happy Toast to animate Buddha playing with his tiny little fat man's cock, a la his parodies of the fat cartoonist.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:14, archived)
# Haha excellent.
And a big happy birthday to Shakyamuni
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 13:51, archived)
# As all atheists know
Spirituality is bunk, as there is no spirit, nor soul, nor gods, nor porpoise.

Now stop worrying and get on with your life.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 13:56, archived)
# Haha
oddly enough, that's pretty much what some Buddhists say too.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 13:59, archived)
# cunts
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:04, archived)
# Hey, that too!
Are you a Buddhist?
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:05, archived)
# No.
I'm just a cunt.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:08, archived)
# As all agnostics know
...er...um...
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:23, archived)
# "Knowledge" is just firm belief.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:26, archived)
# Yeah
It's much better not to know anything and give credence to every half-baked idea you encounter
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:34, archived)
# I don't agree
But whatever floats your boat, honey-bunny.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:39, archived)
# What, you *know* I'm wrong?
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:44, archived)
# I believe strongly that you're wrong.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:49, archived)
# That's just your belief then
I know you're wrong
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 14:57, archived)
# You mean
You believe in your argument, and that the calibration and behaviour of your instruments is correct, the results they give accurate, etc.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 15:06, archived)
# as far as they can be judged empirically and ratified independently
yes
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 15:09, archived)
# So ...
still belief, then.
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 15:14, archived)
# you may believe that
(, Tue 17 May 2011, 15:20, archived)