![Challenge Entry: Merchandise for films that normally wouldn't have merchandise [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)

You know, for as headache inducing as that film was... this may surprise some of you, but I rather liked this film.
From the Merchandise for films that normally wouldn't have merchandise challenge. See all 239 entries (closed)
( , Sat 1 Oct 2011, 14:18, archived)

Crap quake inspired cgi and dodgy camera work, I would however be interested in a new tripod
( ,
Sat 1 Oct 2011, 14:22,
archived)

Definitely didn't live up to the hype.
( ,
Sat 1 Oct 2011, 14:23,
archived)

failed to live up to the hype and smelt like crap
( ,
Sat 1 Oct 2011, 14:24,
archived)

without the tripod
obnoxious characters that you couldn't care less about run around in shakeycam as something makes some noise a bit
dull, and irritating at the end when you realise you'll never get that time back
( ,
Sat 1 Oct 2011, 14:24,
archived)
obnoxious characters that you couldn't care less about run around in shakeycam as something makes some noise a bit
dull, and irritating at the end when you realise you'll never get that time back

The characters up for the chop are so unlikeable, you want them to die. Paranormal Activity was fairly different though, in the way that you sort of hope they'll get through their problem... well, for all the time you're awake during the film.
( ,
Sat 1 Oct 2011, 14:27,
archived)

casting N-Dubz as the heroes was just an irritation from start to finish, plus the lack of comeuppance for them made me angry
( ,
Sat 1 Oct 2011, 14:30,
archived)

Wow... no wonder it didn't do very well.
( ,
Sat 1 Oct 2011, 14:32,
archived)

I think it was on SyFy a month or two ago. Could be mistaken though.
( ,
Sat 1 Oct 2011, 14:38,
archived)

And I'm not being facetious, it's really not.
( ,
Sat 1 Oct 2011, 14:39,
archived)

but more in the way that we are the monsters as much as they are
( ,
Sat 1 Oct 2011, 14:40,
archived)


(if they were hoping for Godzilla)
The start is the end and the tender sex scene made it for me.
( ,
Sat 1 Oct 2011, 14:38,
archived)
The start is the end and the tender sex scene made it for me.

but I agree: Not enough monster, Annoying characters, Improbable video footage (would you really be still filming when under attack from monsters - I think I would drop even an expensive camera and run like fuck), Stupid plot (Big monster destroying buildings, bridges, tanks and even the army can't hold it off yet these people are running towards it to save a girl they don't even know is alive), Impossible Video Camera battery life (I want to know what battery make it is as I would want to power a small village with it)
But apart from that it's a good popcorn movie with some nice effects and leaves you with a "What if" feeling.
( ,
Sat 1 Oct 2011, 14:31,
archived)
But apart from that it's a good popcorn movie with some nice effects and leaves you with a "What if" feeling.

To me, it's like Tron Legacy in the way it's just pretty to look at (I quite liked that film too, but admittedly, the plot was wank). I think this whole first-person perspective film idea died a LONG time ago.
The hell of it is, a few examples of this 'sub-genre' always seem pretty interesting judging by the previews, concept, etc, but always fall flat on their face. Apollo 18 COULD have been good, but was quite disappointing to say the least.
( ,
Sat 1 Oct 2011, 14:36,
archived)
The hell of it is, a few examples of this 'sub-genre' always seem pretty interesting judging by the previews, concept, etc, but always fall flat on their face. Apollo 18 COULD have been good, but was quite disappointing to say the least.

I thought the creation turning on god thing was done quite well
( ,
Sat 1 Oct 2011, 14:40,
archived)

it's a lot more grown up than the original and is well executed but really needs to be watched after the original
( ,
Sat 1 Oct 2011, 14:43,
archived)

Like, what kind of programs are all of the denizens of the Grid? I can assume the club is some sort of media player and Daft Punk are mp3s, or something.
I think the main driving force behind this film is the special effects and soundtrack, which is AMAZING.
( ,
Sat 1 Oct 2011, 14:44,
archived)
I think the main driving force behind this film is the special effects and soundtrack, which is AMAZING.

To see Jeff Bridges struggling to pronounce his lines through his false teeth kind of ruined it for me.
( ,
Sat 1 Oct 2011, 14:47,
archived)

Which is why JJ Abrams and Co. have painted themselves in a corner with a prequel (as they had previously alluded to) as you couldn't possibily do the same stunt again and it would lose it's impact as you would know what was coming. In the original there are little clips (Easter-Eggs) that show a sub-plot of a Japanese Chemical Company who's satelite dish falls to Earth falling into the Atlantic Ocean, and is said to awaken the ancient monster who comes ashore at Cloverfields Manhatten.
( ,
Sat 1 Oct 2011, 14:46,
archived)

Pisses all over Cloverfield with a big smelly Nordic cock.
( ,
Sat 1 Oct 2011, 15:00,
archived)

I love the philosophy of the director too "If you have great monster models used them to the max!" (paraphrasing but that's pretty much what he said)
As soon as I can I'm so going to watch that and own it on DVD
( ,
Sat 1 Oct 2011, 16:00,
archived)
As soon as I can I'm so going to watch that and own it on DVD