b3ta.com board

Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 10581083 (Thread)

Right. I'll try and be civil here, as there is a tiny chance that you are genuine, and NOT a 47-year-old trucker called Dave ... not that I believe it for one moment:

Please stop posting dubious images of kids with underwear showing, child-age animals with underwear showing, nuns being spunked over by tentacle cocks etc etc.

Seriously. It isn't funny, and would be pretty difficult to explain away to my boss should he catch a glimpse of it on my screen. It's one thing to have employees visiting puerile humour sites, and another to have them viewing underage hentai bukkake in their lunch break. If for some reason you really feel the need to keep posting that shit, at least link to it instead and mark it NSFW.

(

drimble he'd been white, he'd been black, Mon 24 Oct 2011, 13:10, archived)

You do understand she wouldn't catch a word of this, right?

She'll probably see it as "YES, I do think your weird borderline-nonce pictures are brilliant! Post them all over the place so I can show my co-workers!"

(

Bourbon Fox Bourbon is a moron, Mon 24 Oct 2011, 13:12, archived)

Maybe I should send that message through babelfish

Seems to be what she's using to make the weird engrish phrases

(cenaris Is dividing 3 by waffle, Mon 24 Oct 2011, 13:27, archived)

I got the following...

"Yes, I'm your borderline strange - I think the image of the nonce are impressive! Please post me around so my colleagues can see!"

Fucking LOL.

(

Bourbon Fox Bourbon is a moron, Mon 24 Oct 2011, 13:30, archived)

She is adult. aren't loli.

(

Death is the Eternal I have not my ally, Mon 24 Oct 2011, 13:26, archived)

how can you say she's an adult? it's an illustration, a depiction. she has no birth date.

your pics contain a lot of children in compromising positions, people don't like it and you have been told this repeatedly.
i find you and your ignorance very tiresome and your art very dull. take it back to da where other perv's can appreciate it.

(

real i'm not happy 'til you're not happy, Mon 24 Oct 2011, 13:38, archived)

Wait.

You say they have no birth date, then you say they're children.
I have mixed feelings about all of this but there's a lot of daily mail-style reactionary nonsense in a lot of these responses.

(

mofaha ┐( ˘_˘)┌ ʅ(́◡◝)ʃ, Mon 24 Oct 2011, 15:16, archived)

^ this

there seems to be a hatred bandwagon, although she is strangely able to take criticism on the chin more easily since she came back

(

Ham o' Shatner -.-- --- ..- .-. / .- .-.. .-.. / --. .- -.--, Mon 24 Oct 2011, 15:30, archived)

As was said the other day

if it wasn't portraying itself as a 'aww, bless her naivety' foreign girl I wonder how tolerant people would be then to the borderline-noncery

(

drimble he'd been white, he'd been black, Mon 24 Oct 2011, 15:41, archived)

I don`t think it`s that bad, or interesting

but I relish the flounce potential

(

Ham o' Shatner -.-- --- ..- .-. / .- .-.. .-.. / --. .- -.--, Mon 24 Oct 2011, 15:55, archived)

my point is that moggy claiming they're adults is neither here nor there

when someone complains that they do not wish to see kiddies being fiddled they don't want to see it. mogg saying they're adults makes no difference
my op was badly written, i had meant to say characters resembling children, or some sort.
i'm not sure what the daily mail responses you are refering to, but i wanted clear up my thoughts on this particular issue

(

real i'm not happy 'til you're not happy, Mon 24 Oct 2011, 16:13, archived)

IIRC

The law applies to images that look like they are of someone under age.
And the ones I've seen on here look like kids.

(Wize, Mon 24 Oct 2011, 22:09, archived)

banjo-on-the-cliff.deviantart.com/art/HappyBirthday-to-me-227843738

(

Death is the Eternal I have not my ally, Mon 24 Oct 2011, 18:24, archived)