The limit is actually 400,000 bytes, not 400KB
Your scant regard for the rules has caused you to go over by 6,543 bytes. As such, my broadband internet experience has been ruined.
I'm going to console myself at web.archive.org and enjoy sites from 1998.
( ,
Thu 16 Feb 2012, 20:46,
archived)
I'm going to console myself at web.archive.org and enjoy sites from 1998.
I've never understood these geek numbers
mind you I've never got my head around floating numbers in maths and 3x3.3 recurring equalling 10
( ,
Thu 16 Feb 2012, 20:50,
archived)
3x3.3 recurring = 10 isn't too bad
cos it's just fractions.
what's insanely annoying is the proof I got shown that 0.999 recurring = 1.
I refuse to believe that. Maybe that's why I'm so shit at calculus.
( ,
Thu 16 Feb 2012, 20:54,
archived)
what's insanely annoying is the proof I got shown that 0.999 recurring = 1.
I refuse to believe that. Maybe that's why I'm so shit at calculus.
You can't argue with Syanz
Or, as my autocorrect puts it, you can't argue with Shane.
( ,
Thu 16 Feb 2012, 21:07,
archived)
It's all about twos, lots of them
Your computer counts bytes in powers of two: 1 KiB = 1024 bytes because 1024 = 210.
People (and sneaky HDD makers) count in powers of ten: 1 KB* = 103.
Don't worry about the 0.3... thing, most people have trouble with that. My solution is to just not think too hard about it.
*I don't know why they use a capital k, it flies in the face of normal SI prefixes, but the i in KiB is there so you know which base (2 or 10) you're dealing with.
( ,
Thu 16 Feb 2012, 23:55,
archived)
People (and sneaky HDD makers) count in powers of ten: 1 KB* = 103.
Don't worry about the 0.3... thing, most people have trouble with that. My solution is to just not think too hard about it.
*I don't know why they use a capital k, it flies in the face of normal SI prefixes, but the i in KiB is there so you know which base (2 or 10) you're dealing with.