![Challenge Entry: Fiction to Science Fiction [challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif)

From the Fiction to Science Fiction challenge. See all 248 entries (closed)
( , Wed 26 Jun 2013, 18:13, archived)

*though it's a distance and not a speed...etc.
( ,
Wed 26 Jun 2013, 18:18,
archived)

but "parsec" is short for "parallax second" and denotes the distance at which an object on the sky would subtend one second of arc across a year.
In any event, I've seen apologists argue that the Kessel Run goes through a field of black holes, and that to do that quickly involves clipping close to the event horizons (and therefore less distance), and so doing the Kessel Run in less than 12 parsecs suggests that the Millennium Falcon was fast enough to get so close to the black holes.
This neat explanation doesn't work on a few grounds. Firstly, it's physically nonsensical due to the entertaining ways in which time and distance are observed differently by different observers, meaning that while to Han Solo it may have been ten parsecs and a quick finish, but to everyone else he'd have taken forever. Secondly, it would be tough judging precisely where the horizon even is, given that there is absolutely nothing in spacetime around you to denote an event horizon (in contradiction to Star Trek Voyager, which seems to think that an event horizon is some kind of hard shell around a black hole that has a "crack" in it that the Voyager could escape through... fuckwits), and a "Kessel Run" would be brutally dangerous. Thirdly, this would suggest an enormous minefield of black holes packed closely together, which may be gravitationally stable but most likely would not be and the holes would be happily merging into one big hole. Fourthly, there is no way George Lucas knew any of this and it's pretty obvious he made a mistake.
Edit: All sarcasm intended purely in jest, I hope you understand.
( ,
Wed 26 Jun 2013, 18:29,
archived)
In any event, I've seen apologists argue that the Kessel Run goes through a field of black holes, and that to do that quickly involves clipping close to the event horizons (and therefore less distance), and so doing the Kessel Run in less than 12 parsecs suggests that the Millennium Falcon was fast enough to get so close to the black holes.
This neat explanation doesn't work on a few grounds. Firstly, it's physically nonsensical due to the entertaining ways in which time and distance are observed differently by different observers, meaning that while to Han Solo it may have been ten parsecs and a quick finish, but to everyone else he'd have taken forever. Secondly, it would be tough judging precisely where the horizon even is, given that there is absolutely nothing in spacetime around you to denote an event horizon (in contradiction to Star Trek Voyager, which seems to think that an event horizon is some kind of hard shell around a black hole that has a "crack" in it that the Voyager could escape through... fuckwits), and a "Kessel Run" would be brutally dangerous. Thirdly, this would suggest an enormous minefield of black holes packed closely together, which may be gravitationally stable but most likely would not be and the holes would be happily merging into one big hole. Fourthly, there is no way George Lucas knew any of this and it's pretty obvious he made a mistake.
Edit: All sarcasm intended purely in jest, I hope you understand.

Damn, I hope I didn't touch a nerve there :P.
( ,
Wed 26 Jun 2013, 18:50,
archived)

I'm constantly frazzled. And being touched.
( ,
Wed 26 Jun 2013, 20:13,
archived)

not many people have laughed when people are talking about black holes. talking about a lack of hair in the kundt spacetime, perhaps, but not black holes.
( ,
Wed 26 Jun 2013, 20:13,
archived)

if that coin is "this isn't really science fiction". Star Wars is generally more fun than Star Trek, if that helps, while Star Trek is more prone to pointless excretions of technobabble.
I always like it when they sweep something with a neutrino beam.
1) Where do they get the neutrinos?
2) What the hell do they expect to learn by aiming a "beam" of the lightest and most weakly-interacting particles in the universe at someone, except that trying to learn anything from them is utterly pointless given how many untold billions of the little bastards sleet through the Earth every second and barely notice.
( ,
Wed 26 Jun 2013, 20:16,
archived)
I always like it when they sweep something with a neutrino beam.
1) Where do they get the neutrinos?
2) What the hell do they expect to learn by aiming a "beam" of the lightest and most weakly-interacting particles in the universe at someone, except that trying to learn anything from them is utterly pointless given how many untold billions of the little bastards sleet through the Earth every second and barely notice.


Like midi-chlorians.
( ,
Wed 26 Jun 2013, 21:16,
archived)

then make something up and talk about that, instead. That's the way Star Trek should live. Yeah.
Yeah.
( ,
Wed 26 Jun 2013, 21:48,
archived)
Yeah.

they have a massive tin of them massive swimming pool of brine with one or two of them in a mountain in japan
( ,
Thu 27 Jun 2013, 5:50,
archived)

( ,
Wed 26 Jun 2013, 19:00,
archived)

Billy Casper is the main character in "Falc".
Casper Weinberger was U.S. Secretary of Defense under Republican President Ronald Reagan from 1981 to 1987.
President Ronald Reagan (or RAYGUN) devised the "Star Wars" defence program.
To be on my desk before games tomorrow, please.
( ,
Wed 26 Jun 2013, 19:11,
archived)
Casper Weinberger was U.S. Secretary of Defense under Republican President Ronald Reagan from 1981 to 1987.
President Ronald Reagan (or RAYGUN) devised the "Star Wars" defence program.
To be on my desk before games tomorrow, please.