War is hell.
(,
Sat 6 Dec 2014, 20:41,
archived)
www.imdb.com/title/tt0907285/
edit some ace photos of Nazi prototypes/plans
(,
Sat 6 Dec 2014, 20:45,
archived)
edit some ace photos of Nazi prototypes/plans
https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=isopontastic&oq=isopontastic&aqs=chrome..69i57.388j0j9&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8
(,
Sat 6 Dec 2014, 20:49,
archived)
I bet they could've bombed the shite out of Berlin, a squadron of them :)
(,
Sat 6 Dec 2014, 21:17,
archived)
i need a sense of scale before i can guess at possible bomb damage
(,
Sat 6 Dec 2014, 21:33,
archived)
if the kits in available scales line everything up!
The perspective needs a bit of foodling if you ever go for a remake.
(,
Sat 6 Dec 2014, 21:53,
archived)
The perspective needs a bit of foodling if you ever go for a remake.
(, Sat 6 Dec 2014, 22:18, archived)
Penguins actually disprove the Bible. Anyone who had invented them would boast about it, but they don't get a mention.
(,
Sat 6 Dec 2014, 23:12,
archived)
The RAF wanted to try them, but not with the superchargers or counter rotating propellers. Which was a bit like wanting a Ferrari but insisting on a 1.0 litre engine to save a few quid.
(,
Sat 6 Dec 2014, 22:48,
archived)
counter rotating props mean two sets of spare engines and many parts? I can see that logistically that would be a problem. You can't just make an engine run backwards.
(,
Sat 6 Dec 2014, 23:00,
archived)
as 'counter rotating props man'
the most niche superhero ever
(,
Sat 6 Dec 2014, 23:15,
archived)
the most niche superhero ever
Perhaps he worked on Only Fools and Horses and rotated the counter...
(,
Sat 6 Dec 2014, 23:26,
archived)
I think the point was that the P38 was designed with superchargers and counter rotating props. The RAF insisted on a version with those features removed and found it wanting, cancelling their order. The U.S. then had considerable success with it as designed.
(,
Sat 6 Dec 2014, 23:24,
archived)





