
War is hell.
( ,
Sat 6 Dec 2014, 20:41,
archived)


www.imdb.com/title/tt0907285/
edit some ace photos of Nazi prototypes/plans
( ,
Sat 6 Dec 2014, 20:45,
archived)
edit some ace photos of Nazi prototypes/plans

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=isopontastic&oq=isopontastic&aqs=chrome..69i57.388j0j9&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=122&ie=UTF-8
( ,
Sat 6 Dec 2014, 20:49,
archived)

I bet they could've bombed the shite out of Berlin, a squadron of them :)
( ,
Sat 6 Dec 2014, 21:17,
archived)

i need a sense of scale before i can guess at possible bomb damage
( ,
Sat 6 Dec 2014, 21:33,
archived)

if the kits in available scales line everything up!
The perspective needs a bit of foodling if you ever go for a remake.
( ,
Sat 6 Dec 2014, 21:53,
archived)
The perspective needs a bit of foodling if you ever go for a remake.

( , Sat 6 Dec 2014, 22:18, archived)

Penguins actually disprove the Bible. Anyone who had invented them would boast about it, but they don't get a mention.
( ,
Sat 6 Dec 2014, 23:12,
archived)

The RAF wanted to try them, but not with the superchargers or counter rotating propellers. Which was a bit like wanting a Ferrari but insisting on a 1.0 litre engine to save a few quid.
( ,
Sat 6 Dec 2014, 22:48,
archived)

counter rotating props mean two sets of spare engines and many parts? I can see that logistically that would be a problem. You can't just make an engine run backwards.
( ,
Sat 6 Dec 2014, 23:00,
archived)

as 'counter rotating props man'
the most niche superhero ever
( ,
Sat 6 Dec 2014, 23:15,
archived)
the most niche superhero ever

Perhaps he worked on Only Fools and Horses and rotated the counter...
( ,
Sat 6 Dec 2014, 23:26,
archived)

I think the point was that the P38 was designed with superchargers and counter rotating props. The RAF insisted on a version with those features removed and found it wanting, cancelling their order. The U.S. then had considerable success with it as designed.
( ,
Sat 6 Dec 2014, 23:24,
archived)