Due to NASA funding cutbacks
From the Budget Cuts challenge. See all 747 entries (closed)
( , Tue 14 Oct 2003, 16:05, archived)
Space exploration is now limited to charting and mapping blanket sky
Edit: my 500th post is a frontpage. how bloody good is that? :)
Edit: my 500th post is a frontpage. how bloody good is that? :)
From the Budget Cuts challenge. See all 747 entries (closed)
( , Tue 14 Oct 2003, 16:05, archived)
Yay for Mr Spoon.
If you are floating in outer space and release a fart are you propelled forwards?
( ,
Tue 14 Oct 2003, 16:07,
archived)
yes
yes you are, next?
p.s. IF you are then youre naked and probably decompressing violently at the same time so its largely irrelevant.
( ,
Tue 14 Oct 2003, 16:08,
archived)
p.s. IF you are then youre naked and probably decompressing violently at the same time so its largely irrelevant.
unless there was some sort of non-return vent in your space suit.
Currently I imagine the astronauts just have to put up with the odour until their air scrubbers get to work.
( ,
Tue 14 Oct 2003, 16:10,
archived)
I kind of meant
in a spacecraft, in outer space. So with air but no gravity. No matter, wasn't intending on testing it out just yet.
( ,
Tue 14 Oct 2003, 16:12,
archived)
No
you just pollute your spacesuit.
If you're not wearing a spacesuit, in theory you would be pushed forward, but the combined effects of all your bodily fluids gently boiling are likely to dominate.
( ,
Tue 14 Oct 2003, 16:12,
archived)
If you're not wearing a spacesuit, in theory you would be pushed forward, but the combined effects of all your bodily fluids gently boiling are likely to dominate.
Having said that,
the technology involved in making a baked bean tin that size, and then firing it into space, must have been quite something.
( ,
Tue 14 Oct 2003, 16:08,
archived)
I expect
they were sent to Ethiopia and given to the starving people.
( ,
Tue 14 Oct 2003, 16:12,
archived)
actually I imagine
that with the bureacracy associated with the UN, there's probably some huge baked bean mountain somewhere.
( ,
Tue 14 Oct 2003, 16:13,
archived)