But...
he has some kind of tatoo on his toe... quite sexay that!
(
Monocromatico Lady Godiva's horse,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 0:38,
archived)
yes.
I agree with that completely - she's not unattractive, but I'm pretty sure that her casting in that role may have had something to do with her involvement in funding the film.
(
barnesy,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 0:28,
archived)
i think perhaps the fact
that she is really rather pretty may have helped.
(
Sir Sand GOBLIN ^popular page dis,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 0:31,
archived)
Oo, I thought *I*
was the cynic round here!
(
witchy is covered in BEES,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 0:32,
archived)
agreed.
i always thought she was the prettiest.
but then, i don't like bags of bones.
(
Sir Sand GOBLIN ^popular page dis,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 0:27,
archived)
but did he mean you or drew?
i'm about ready to start knocking heads whatever he meant
(
vork and burlap,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 0:32,
archived)
i'm tired of this argument already.
my nerves aren't what they used to be.
(
cwethan,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 0:33,
archived)
shut up.
just because she's not made of bones and breast.
(
Sir Sand GOBLIN ^popular page dis,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 0:32,
archived)
yay!
let us dance, and enjoy the actually pretty ladies, instead of the bony skags we're told are meant to be pretty.
(
Sir Sand GOBLIN ^popular page dis,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 0:34,
archived)
*pops on
puffmetal and dances like a hamster*
(
lemony,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 0:39,
archived)
shirley those must
be involved somewhere in the recipe? Or is she made of jam? Yeah!
(
witchy is covered in BEES,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 0:35,
archived)
well yes, she does have bones and breast.
but she has them in normal, human proportions.
which i like.
(
Sir Sand GOBLIN ^popular page dis,
Tue 6 Jan 2004, 0:37,
archived)