b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 4045846 (Thread)

# Come on of all the people
Sid was an iconoclast and a rebel that the system hated. This isn't humour, send up someone who deserves this not Sid.
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:09, archived)
# Easy tiger!
Blimey. It's only a funny pic. Worked for me.
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:12, archived)
# Well this whole kiddy-fucking humour
is totally lame and now it's suppose to be funny so long as you can stick the back of a child's head near the crouch region of any celebrity and call it humour. I'm totally out of touch with the world if this is now funny.

Ordinarily I would have just ignored such stuff, but not when Sid Vicious is dragged into it.
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:15, archived)
# i agree with maiden that this is all the sucks
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:16, archived)
# Yes, ban this humour based on
imagery of iconic celebrities!
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:23, archived)
# :-)
Bad bad. Now *there* was an icon...
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:34, archived)
# Hypocrit
That twat had all he ever wanted and still blew his fucking brains out.
And without the likes of Sid he would have never been famous.
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:35, archived)
# Hmm...
Yes Kurt Cobain was a very flawed character but shirley you shouldnt be exercising double standards by protecting who you see as a legend but slagging off someone who was a legend to other people?
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:38, archived)
# Okay I admit it was a bit strong to call Sid a god
and as I've already stated he had flaws, but that isn't the issue. the issue here is: Is Sid Vicious fair game for the kiddy-fucking joke that you lot seem to love too much around here? And the answer is NO! No fucking way!
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:43, archived)
# EVERY celebrity
is fair game on b3ta. This board thrives on celebrity parody as part of it's staple diet. If we all worried about whether or not we'd be stepping on someone's toes with every picture, this board would half hardly any new images. I certainly wouldn't have made the Michael J Fox series if I was owrried about whether or not a few might be offended by it.

I'm sure lots of people get offended by lots of pictures on here, but that's par for the course. People who offend easily really should find a nice board where people don't say things like fucksocks, arsebiscuits and cuntymints.
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:46, archived)
# I don't think it's true to say every celebrity is fair game
and if someone like John Peel, for instance, was getting this treatment there would be more than just me complaining.
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:48, archived)
# I am in no doubt that
John peel has had several offensive pictures posted about him. Along with many other people far more deserving of exempt status.
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:49, archived)
# Well personally I believe the person has to deserve
being ridiculed, Like Jackson, Townsend, Glitter etc. But we aren't talking about a bit of a leg pull, the inference is much worse in this case.
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:51, archived)
# Meh
People see the easy jokes first. Dont let it bother you, people will always be closed minded that will never change.

That is all.
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:46, archived)
# I'm just making the point that one man's icon
is another's trash can. I don't think (my *opinion*) either Vicious or Cobain deserve the plaudits. And I just can't get that fired up by semi-talented people who grew famous through media sideshows rather than music. FWIW, to me The Clash were the band of the time, as their *music* actually spoke for itself. But I don't expect everyone to agree with me. And it wouldn't bother me if someone posted a GIF anim of Joe Strummer dropping dead while walking his dog. I thought irreverence was one of the reasons for this place?
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:48, archived)
# I agree.
I'd take the clash over the pistols any day of the week.

*fires up winamp*
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:58, archived)
# damn you all this is not funny!
pete-o-townsend of the who however...
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:39, archived)
# To be honest,
if it didn't say kid sex, and if this weren't B3ta, you wouldn't even be able to tell that's a child.
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:19, archived)
# It looks
like a cornish pasty to me.
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:21, archived)
# Much funnier!
The Sex Pasties
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:25, archived)
# Oooh.
Pasty fucking.
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:25, archived)
# now
THAT'S sick and disgusting. For shame!
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:27, archived)
# Jesus made me do it.
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:35, archived)
# Damn him
and his meddling ways! Damn him to hell!
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:38, archived)
# Aye, the hippie twat
that he was.
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:49, archived)
# That's a silly point to raise
the whole premise of this image is Kiddy Sex. So to say it could be anything makes the entire image meaningless.
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:28, archived)
# OK, OK, it's a matter of taste and we disagree
But complaiining about stuff being offensive or lame in B3TA seems a bit pointless. No? :-)

Don't get mad just because one of your icons took the blast. Surely we can all live in peace and harmony and resolve our differences without resorting to punk bands. Or something.
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:23, archived)
# With you there
you can take the piss out of anyone you like, but the whole having sex with kids thing isn't really humour it's just being a knob. A big gay spangly knob with tinsel on.And baubles. And warts.
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 20:33, archived)
# Oooooh
Don't touch teh Sid he is god!!111!!

FFS he's (or was) a bloke just like you me and the next guy. He got pissed, swore alot, and played bass. He didn't save the world.
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:23, archived)
# Your so l33t 111!!!oneoneone how could I ever disagree!
I know Sid wasn't a god, but he doesn't deserve this shit.
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:31, archived)
# You could say the same
about almost everyone on this board who has had their image pulled apart, dissected and laughed at by everyone on here.

If you disagree with the kiddy sex humour aspect (which personally I find dodgy ground as well) then thats one thing, but to get on your high horse because of the person involved is hypocritcal.
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:49, archived)
# Agree totally.
Most people who are ridiculed here via shoppings don't deserve it, but why should we give a fuck? If you find it funny, you find it funny, if you don't, you don't. Move on. For whatever reason, this made me laugh, and yes, I think it's dodgy territory too. But so is much stuff in here.

On another note, the original poster still has L-plates, and it's only their second post. I thought the forum FAQ said something about going easy on n00bs and not being directly insulting? I think "GET TO FUCK" because the post didn't seem funny is a bit OTT.
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:54, archived)
# There's a FAQ?
:)

And this a rarity for me. I managed to get three posts into a thread before it vanished into ancietn history
(, Sun 12 Dec 2004, 17:57, archived)