b3ta.com board

Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 4479091 (Thread)

Yes becuase Im a tory it automaticly makes me a dickhead

Proves the properganda is working

(bewitched_fan_2k, Sun 10 Apr 2005, 17:52, archived)

Well, your spelling is proof

that British education is failing.

(

S Snail wore out his welcome with random precision, Sun 10 Apr 2005, 17:53, archived)

The 1980s and 90s were propaganda?

Thank God for that, I thought they were real.

(A small damp ball of cotton, Sun 10 Apr 2005, 17:53, archived)

we will be back one day

The joke will all be on you all, when we come back to power (at some point)

We WILL have our time again

(bewitched_fan_2k, Sun 10 Apr 2005, 17:55, archived)

I do not respond well to threats, Mr Howard.

Although you do realise how odd it looks, your political views taking the form of a threat?

(A small damp ball of cotton, Sun 10 Apr 2005, 17:57, archived)

I really hope the flux capacitor is broken Marty

(

oCo, Sun 10 Apr 2005, 17:58, archived)

Are you sure you're a tory

and not a member of the Illuminati?

(

wayward., Sun 10 Apr 2005, 17:59, archived)

you left off the

"Mwa-hahahahaha!!!"

(

spacehog, Sun 10 Apr 2005, 17:59, archived)

I thought that the idea was....

..... that the party in power worked for the good of the country, and had little to do with 'having our time' and 'power' etc. Maybe the Tories are just power crazed neo-nazis after all.
besides which, there are no nationalised industries to sell off now, to artificially, and temporarily, stimulate the economy, as Thatcher did. Oh, and Blair's getting slagged for fighting a third world country, so the Tories can't even do that one now

(

the wild elk Freeing excellence affects reality, Sun 10 Apr 2005, 18:02, archived)

I'm inclined to think that selling off nationalised industries

permanently improved the economy, by reducing the amount of tax needed to support them and removing their artificial advantage. On the other hand Major artificially and temporarily stimulated the economy by borrowing lots of money and caused a recession a few years later. trafficconeshotlinearseface

(_Felix 's school of dance and occult sciences, Sun 10 Apr 2005, 18:07, archived)

Perhaps in things like telecommunications

[I would hate to think I was still stuck with the Post Office for my telephone] the increased competition has been beneficial; in essential services such as electricity, gas and water it definitely has not - higher prices, especially for the poorest on 'card meters' who actually pay more per unit than the rich.

And don't even mention trains.

(

Uzbek Lobster http://custardsurgery.com/azerbaijan, Sun 10 Apr 2005, 18:10, archived)

The trains

(mentions trains) are hampered by rules designed to create competition where there shouldn't be any competition. That kind of thing really irritates me. "Ooh, these people all offer the same service, and by rights there should only be one company offering it, but that would be a monopoly and we know monopolies are bad, don't we children, so let's force them to work seperately and then they'll lower their prices, just like competition in the real world."
Trains compete against other transport services, in reality. Possibly this means there shouldn't be any trains, or possibly if there was only one train company (or two) it would be a success. But making a pretence of a competetive market where there's no reason for one is just naive.

(_Felix 's school of dance and occult sciences, Sun 10 Apr 2005, 18:14, archived)

Yikes! *hides*

told you not to mention them

(

Uzbek Lobster http://custardsurgery.com/azerbaijan, Sun 10 Apr 2005, 18:15, archived)

HAHAHAHA

I think I love you.

(Withiel assumes the position!, Sun 10 Apr 2005, 17:55, archived)

Who me?

Okay. Trousers off.

(A small damp ball of cotton, Sun 10 Apr 2005, 18:02, archived)

Quite.

Unlike this unpleasant little Tory fanboy some of us here are old enough to remember just how bad the last Tory government really were.

(Dr Hotdog is considering getting shot in t'eyes with lasers, Sun 10 Apr 2005, 17:56, archived)

---

If they were SOOO bad how come they lasted 18 years then??? hmm???

and they were 100 times better than these fuckwits

(bewitched_fan_2k, Sun 10 Apr 2005, 17:58, archived)

you're so good with numbers

and aren't you supposed to not swear or something ?

(

oCo, Sun 10 Apr 2005, 18:00, archived)

interesting statistics

(

spacehog, Sun 10 Apr 2005, 18:00, archived)

Probably the same reason George won last year:

MOST PEOPLE ARE IMMENSELY STUPID FUCKING CUNTS

(A small damp ball of cotton, Sun 10 Apr 2005, 18:04, archived)

Not most people.

There has never been a voting majority for the Tories [or any one party] in living memory. It's a fucked-up voting system that has allowed parties to rule with huge parliamentary majorities despite only polling around 40%.

(

Uzbek Lobster http://custardsurgery.com/azerbaijan, Sun 10 Apr 2005, 18:07, archived)

Bugger off you ignorant troll

How did they stay in so long? A combination of lack of credible opposition, terrorism and a war which distracted the electorate from important issues, and idiots like yourself. Much the same sort of stuff that's keeping the Blair government in power now, which I don't like either.

Maybe when you're older you'll be able to talk politics properly with the grown ups.

(Dr Hotdog is considering getting shot in t'eyes with lasers, Sun 10 Apr 2005, 18:08, archived)

I wouldn't say 'dickhead'

More like 'An arrogant, ignorant dickhead'.

(

Uzbek Lobster http://custardsurgery.com/azerbaijan, Sun 10 Apr 2005, 17:54, archived)

"we will be back one day
The joke will all be on you all, when we come back to power (at some point)

We WILL have our time again"

*insert NOOOOOOOO!!!/MWHAHHAA!!!* here.

(holystorm, Sun 10 Apr 2005, 17:57, archived)

No,

because you're a dickhead it automatically makes you a dickhead.

As does your grasp of English.

(Tetsuo, Sun 10 Apr 2005, 18:05, archived)