Second post, woo.
Here for biggerness
Click here if you're a sucky dial-up fed up of waiting for my bandwith whorage [/uber hyperlink]
From the What if Jim Davidson was Prime Minister? challenge. See all 150 entries (closed)
( , Tue 9 Aug 2005, 19:26, archived)
Here for biggerness
Click here if you're a sucky dial-up fed up of waiting for my bandwith whorage [/uber hyperlink]
From the What if Jim Davidson was Prime Minister? challenge. See all 150 entries (closed)
( , Tue 9 Aug 2005, 19:26, archived)
250kb limit
And that's only really accepted with animations. Still images should generally try to be well under 200kb. Still, fun image
( ,
Tue 9 Aug 2005, 19:29,
archived)
Well... technically I have the capacity to download at up to 210kBs
but I really like to get at newbies think these things need pointing out
( ,
Tue 9 Aug 2005, 19:38,
archived)
My bandwidth is so inadeqaute *sniffles*
I'm going to get a sex change...
( ,
Tue 9 Aug 2005, 19:42,
archived)
Very snazzy
But you might want to optimise it a little.
I take it you are using Tattyshop?
If so, save it as a jpeg and use the lsider to lower the quality. On hand-drawn pictures like this one it will not show up much.
Hehe, now you have linked it, get rid of the arrow-brackets cause its showing as a redex ;)
( ,
Tue 9 Aug 2005, 19:30,
archived)
I take it you are using Tattyshop?
If so, save it as a jpeg and use the lsider to lower the quality. On hand-drawn pictures like this one it will not show up much.
Hehe, now you have linked it, get rid of the arrow-brackets cause its showing as a redex ;)
Yeah, I just hate the fuzzyness.
*buggers off to fiddle with it*
( ,
Tue 9 Aug 2005, 19:33,
archived)
I dont know why more people dont use Imageshack's thumbnails.
I would if I evr made a picture large enough that it might offend
( ,
Tue 9 Aug 2005, 19:34,
archived)
To be honest you can't even really notice the quality difference when gif'd
without diffusion
( ,
Tue 9 Aug 2005, 19:33,
archived)
Oh. My apologies and here's your fiver back.
*hands over obviously counterfeit note*
( ,
Tue 9 Aug 2005, 19:38,
archived)
why not a gif?
edit : default settings (in gimp) - jpeg ~25k, gif ~50k - both better than 100 odd kb
( ,
Tue 9 Aug 2005, 19:38,
archived)
Only if you give it some really silly size and compression level.
A top quality JPEG is only 139kB
( ,
Tue 9 Aug 2005, 19:44,
archived)
gif it hard
much better
plus i rather like the dithery look - and it hides a multitude of seams
( ,
Tue 9 Aug 2005, 19:45,
archived)
plus i rather like the dithery look - and it hides a multitude of seams
maybe you compressed it too much
it's about 20kb, let it grow to 50kb or something and it'll probably get better.
( ,
Tue 9 Aug 2005, 19:45,
archived)
woo indeed!
i must say we're getting off rather lightly today. welcome to b3ta
( ,
Tue 9 Aug 2005, 19:44,
archived)
I was a member a year or so ago.
Forgot my username and password. I made myself a universal one now.
But yeah, Woo Yay.
( ,
Tue 9 Aug 2005, 19:47,
archived)
But yeah, Woo Yay.
Have I missed some really heavy recent tuesdays?
Must admit I haven't been posting much since that Hoff compo.
( ,
Tue 9 Aug 2005, 19:47,
archived)