
I went to a certian place the other day on the train... here's my ticket:
cfb
NeoThermic
( ,
Tue 15 Nov 2005, 17:27,
archived)

NeoThermic

better to optimise thon pictures over thonder.. 50K should be ample, I say, ample

The compression ratio in my thumbnail script is set to 50%, on top of the resize. Can you suggest a better value? (with a reminder that anything below 45% really does look crap).
NeoThermic
( ,
Tue 15 Nov 2005, 17:30,
archived)
NeoThermic

are even larger for this paticular image. Sadly. I love PNG's too. :(
NeoThermic
( ,
Tue 15 Nov 2005, 17:35,
archived)
NeoThermic

and all, but the image you see here is generated from a script that can only read/write jpeg or png. I'll give 40% a go for my next set of thumbs though.
NeoThermic
( ,
Tue 15 Nov 2005, 17:39,
archived)
NeoThermic

even if it squeezes 10K off it without making it look shit
- but fair play to you, you`ve obviously had a go and know what you`re on about, so I can`t complain too much
( ,
Tue 15 Nov 2005, 17:38,
archived)
- but fair play to you, you`ve obviously had a go and know what you`re on about, so I can`t complain too much

look, don't use your clever thumbnail thingie, get yourself a trial version of potatoshop or download GIMP and resize it and save it properly
that pic will look fine at about 30k, easy
PNGs are the absolute worst for optimisation (except BMPs which don't even bother trying) - only useful for the 24-bit alpha channel, meaning smooth transparent bits - and even then most browsers don't support them properly yet so no point at all really aside from importing bitmaps into flash
( ,
Tue 15 Nov 2005, 17:38,
archived)
that pic will look fine at about 30k, easy
PNGs are the absolute worst for optimisation (except BMPs which don't even bother trying) - only useful for the 24-bit alpha channel, meaning smooth transparent bits - and even then most browsers don't support them properly yet so no point at all really aside from importing bitmaps into flash

I've already got a full legitimate copy of CS2. :)
Anywho, I use the script because I'm rather lazy and its quick; I save the image, upload via FTP, click the link, and boom, I've got a gallery and a thumbnail in one go.
Although others are slightly right, I might try lower values for other images.
And in reply to the ninja edit you just did, PNG is ace for screenshots, or anything that can be expressed in vector format using less instructions than a JPEG would take (thats the whole idea behind PNG). If you do a screenshot on an average desktop, normally PNG is smaller than a JPEG of the same thing.
NeoThermic
( ,
Tue 15 Nov 2005, 17:44,
archived)
Anywho, I use the script because I'm rather lazy and its quick; I save the image, upload via FTP, click the link, and boom, I've got a gallery and a thumbnail in one go.
Although others are slightly right, I might try lower values for other images.
And in reply to the ninja edit you just did, PNG is ace for screenshots, or anything that can be expressed in vector format using less instructions than a JPEG would take (thats the whole idea behind PNG). If you do a screenshot on an average desktop, normally PNG is smaller than a JPEG of the same thing.
NeoThermic

\m/ ROCK ON!
NeoThermic
( ,
Tue 15 Nov 2005, 17:46,
archived)
NeoThermic

when you're on a board where users often have bandwidth limits you'll get a lot of complaints about an image that's four times bigger than it needs to be
and PNG isn't a vector format, it's a bitmap format, same as JPEG, GIF, BMP, TIF and all the rest. you're also horribly wrong about the screenshot thing too, but never mind
open up that copy of CS2 and have a play saving things at different JPEG quality settings, you'll be amazed
( ,
Tue 15 Nov 2005, 17:49,
archived)
and PNG isn't a vector format, it's a bitmap format, same as JPEG, GIF, BMP, TIF and all the rest. you're also horribly wrong about the screenshot thing too, but never mind
open up that copy of CS2 and have a play saving things at different JPEG quality settings, you'll be amazed

and he hasn`t run off in a huff like some new users on a Tuesday - NeoThermic gets a thumb up* from me and a wee "welcome to the board" type thing
*the bum
NeoThermic
( ,
Tue 15 Nov 2005, 17:50,
archived)
*the bum
NeoThermic

i'm trying not to be mean, i really am. i was a noob not so long ago, hehe
i'm a web monkey by trade though and know tons about this crap - even how the algorithms behind JPEG and GIF compression work, although christ knows why
anyway, yes, to NeoThermic, sorry if i sounded off but learn you must young padawan
NeoThermic
( ,
Tue 15 Nov 2005, 17:54,
archived)
i'm a web monkey by trade though and know tons about this crap - even how the algorithms behind JPEG and GIF compression work, although christ knows why
anyway, yes, to NeoThermic, sorry if i sounded off but learn you must young padawan
NeoThermic

...I'm just more worried about the fact that everyone is now singing their posts as me!
Anywho, said image is now 7008 bytes. I've tweaked my auto-thumbnail script, hopefully it should generate sub-50kb thumbs.
/me cowers in a corner over all the 'NeoThermic' sigs
NeoThermic
( ,
Tue 15 Nov 2005, 18:02,
archived)
Anywho, said image is now 7008 bytes. I've tweaked my auto-thumbnail script, hopefully it should generate sub-50kb thumbs.
/me cowers in a corner over all the 'NeoThermic' sigs
NeoThermic

then paste into word
then embed in a powerpoint presentation
that should do it
( ,
Tue 15 Nov 2005, 17:42,
archived)
then embed in a powerpoint presentation
that should do it

since imitation is the sincerest form of flattery...
NeoThermic
( ,
Tue 15 Nov 2005, 17:45,
archived)
NeoThermic

*runs like fuck*
NeoThermic

Run like fuck, or I'll get some off you.
(:
NeoThermic
( ,
Tue 15 Nov 2005, 17:54,
archived)
(:
NeoThermic

Unless you have (non-man) tits it's most likely not flattery
NeoThermic
( ,
Tue 15 Nov 2005, 17:53,
archived)
NeoThermic



.. and the people with download limits
.. and people who don`t see having a fast connection as a reason to see it clogged to the point of feeling like being on dial up
the point of compression is to make efficient use of bandwith, not force people to pay more for a faster connection
( ,
Tue 15 Nov 2005, 17:41,
archived)
.. and people who don`t see having a fast connection as a reason to see it clogged to the point of feeling like being on dial up
the point of compression is to make efficient use of bandwith, not force people to pay more for a faster connection

Popped through mine last night, so they cut my service to a 10th of the speed. It's like being back in the dark ages.
Who the hell sets a cap at 10 gig?
( ,
Tue 15 Nov 2005, 17:48,
archived)
Who the hell sets a cap at 10 gig?

that they pay through the teeth for :\
count yourself lucky little fella
NeoThermic
( ,
Tue 15 Nov 2005, 17:51,
archived)
count yourself lucky little fella
NeoThermic