b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » Message 6328008 (Thread)

# yep thats about the sum of it
but I never understand why he had to perform the test when it was purely about a concept?

i.e. not knowing one way or another and never knowing.
(, Wed 13 Sep 2006, 17:12, archived)
# woo to the pic
Toasty did you receive my email?
(, Wed 13 Sep 2006, 17:13, archived)
# yes, there's a fairly big pile now that injury has slowed me down
so I will try and get round to you, but don't hold your breath too long!
(, Wed 13 Sep 2006, 17:14, archived)
# thanks anyway
have a nice day Toast
(, Wed 13 Sep 2006, 17:20, archived)
# if you we going to drop a cat in acid you want to watch wouldn't you?
i think that's the flaw in his theory.

/huntingdon life sciences blog
(, Wed 13 Sep 2006, 17:14, archived)
# you do like trying to rub me up the wrong way don't you ;)
Just use that big barbed dildo like I told you.
(, Wed 13 Sep 2006, 17:16, archived)
# hehehe
sorry, it's not aimed directly at you.

and i couldn't hurt animals in a cruel way, killing for food, like bunnys, pheasents, etc...

that's fine by me, culling grey squiggles, not a problem, tis fine by me.

not a big fan of animal testing, even less vivisection.

all aprt from teh persian cat that comes into my garden and shits everywhere, he shall be getting a big blast with the super soaker next time i see him.
(, Wed 13 Sep 2006, 17:31, archived)
# Huntingdon Life Sciences is actually a really clean place
except for the people outside.

In all seriousness though, while I agree testing cosmetics and things on rabbits is a waste of good mascara, the place does actually kill the wee beasties ina relatively humane way...before cutting their heads off with a big pair of teachers scissors.
(, Wed 13 Sep 2006, 17:20, archived)
# I would have no problems with testing of drugs and cosmetics
if it was done on humans and babies.

I fail to see how mankind has managed to decide we have a greater right to live than any other species on the planet.
(, Wed 13 Sep 2006, 17:22, archived)
# It's all about money
and while the corporations (who act all corporationey) have it, animals do not. Governments will grant licenses to companies to do that sort of thing in exchange for some healthy donations.
(, Wed 13 Sep 2006, 17:27, archived)
# Tell it to the stingrays
:P
(, Wed 13 Sep 2006, 17:27, archived)
# Schrodingers kittens
yeah but don't look inside otherwise you might kill the poor little bugger (or maybe not....)
(, Wed 13 Sep 2006, 17:14, archived)
# Thats the whole point.
The cat is in a state of quantum flux whilst the observer is ignorant of the outcome. By opening the box the observer collapses the quantum wave function through their interaction with the process, reducing it to one of two states, either alive or dead.

It's all about how until anything is interacted with, ie: observed, it is in an unfixed state.

AICMFP!
(, Wed 13 Sep 2006, 17:33, archived)
# He didn't perform the experiment
it was a thought experiment. The outcome depends on the quantum probability of a radioactive isotope decaying or not. Or you could apply it to the location of a single electron or some other quantum uncertainty.

The cat is both alive and dead until it's measured. Because the isotope is both and neither decayed and intact until you check to see. Superposition of states until you collapse the wave function.

And stuff.
(, Wed 13 Sep 2006, 17:31, archived)
# *asplodes*
Remind me never to talk to you whilst sober. :)
(, Wed 13 Sep 2006, 17:32, archived)
# phew,
I thought that stupid science types may have actually tested it, missing the point of it being a concept and not a weekend project.
(, Wed 13 Sep 2006, 17:41, archived)
# Scientists are people too
they're (we're?) not all power-crazed cackling loons in lab coats.
(, Wed 13 Sep 2006, 17:44, archived)