No it's not good.
EDIT: Woo withdrawn on account of the artwork not being yours, and the size of the image.
( ,
Fri 27 Oct 2006, 18:06,
archived)
it's great
aside from the lack of actual writing space
assuming that's what it's for
oh and the size
( ,
Fri 27 Oct 2006, 18:07,
archived)
assuming that's what it's for
oh and the size
woo
i like the image
but the filesize is too big
optimise it please
Hello new person. Please read our FAQ. Cheers.
( ,
Fri 27 Oct 2006, 18:08,
archived)
but the filesize is too big
optimise it please
Hello new person. Please read our FAQ. Cheers.
If the images on the board are too big
what possible good could come from sticking another 44KB on there?
( ,
Fri 27 Oct 2006, 18:11,
archived)
it reminds all the good folk, old and new, to read the FAQ
i would imagine
( ,
Fri 27 Oct 2006, 18:15,
archived)
Half the images on this page are inder 1k
rather than patronising peoples good work with the same image over and over think about what they have done, how it will actually affect others and then act accordingly
Although 194k os bloody massive for a still
( ,
Fri 27 Oct 2006, 18:32,
archived)
Although 194k os bloody massive for a still
see you could do it in text rather than just making it worse.
better yet you could explain nicely that the filesize is a bit big and ask them if they'd mind optimising it a bit, preferably to around 50k
( ,
Fri 27 Oct 2006, 18:55,
archived)
No offence
But it's horribly tankgirl derivative. Especially the faces.
:-P
Don't stop trying on my account though. And the bathtub has nice little legs.
( ,
Fri 27 Oct 2006, 18:08,
archived)
:-P
Don't stop trying on my account though. And the bathtub has nice little legs.
whats it for
other than to show you can scan pictures of Tank girl?
And why is it 200K?
( ,
Fri 27 Oct 2006, 18:10,
archived)
And why is it 200K?