![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
and now she's kicked me out for being a gay.
Link it.
Edit: Ooooh! Get you lot!
( ,
Sat 16 Dec 2006, 12:56,
archived)
Link it.
Edit: Ooooh! Get you lot!
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Despite the obvious horrific nature of that picture, you seem to be complaining about a 60 KB images by posting a 100 KB image on the board.
Way to help those on dial-up and limited broadband.
( ,
Sat 16 Dec 2006, 13:03,
archived)
Way to help those on dial-up and limited broadband.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
yes, i know, it's an anim
but your spacktastic image could be 25k instead of 100k if you'd just use 16 colors instead of 256. and even smaller if you'd reduce the physical size too
/pedant blog
( ,
Sat 16 Dec 2006, 13:05,
archived)
but your spacktastic image could be 25k instead of 100k if you'd just use 16 colors instead of 256. and even smaller if you'd reduce the physical size too
/pedant blog
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Fair point about the amount of colours though.
( ,
Sat 16 Dec 2006, 13:09,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
and then use width="" to make it physically bigger on screen.
Like this...
![](http://www.b3ta.com/images/icons/mysterybob_flyingsaucer.gif)
( ,
Sat 16 Dec 2006, 13:11,
archived)
Like this...
![](http://www.b3ta.com/images/icons/mysterybob_flyingsaucer.gif)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
thanks alot for the design, i really love my flying saucer icon
( ,
Sat 16 Dec 2006, 13:15,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
our new giant snail overlords
*runs for the hills*
( ,
Sat 16 Dec 2006, 13:18,
archived)
*runs for the hills*
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
![](http://www.b3tards.com/uploads/DUCK.gif)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
but trying to enforce the rules by breaking/stretching them doesn't seem to be the right way
unless you're part of the bush/blair administration circus
( ,
Sat 16 Dec 2006, 13:13,
archived)
unless you're part of the bush/blair administration circus
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I was within the rules, but I take your point.
Not like THAT!
( ,
Sat 16 Dec 2006, 13:14,
archived)
Not like THAT!
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
i just want all of us to get along and live happily ever after
/hungover dreamland blog
( ,
Sat 16 Dec 2006, 13:19,
archived)
/hungover dreamland blog
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
I really regret writing specific numbers in the FAQ. It has just given rise to a cult of people waiting with baited breath to pounce on anybody posting an image 2 or 3 KB over a limit that I just happened to pull out of my ass with no scientific reasoning behind it.
It's about using optimisation to make your images no larger than they need to be, rather than sticking rigidly to a number. If there are any problematically huge pictures on the board, then there are mods who can fix it.
One thing I have learned on b3ta over the years though, is that people like to define a set of board rules so they can pick on new people when they break one of those rules.
I think it probably has to do with compensating for penis size.
( ,
Sat 16 Dec 2006, 13:23,
archived)
It's about using optimisation to make your images no larger than they need to be, rather than sticking rigidly to a number. If there are any problematically huge pictures on the board, then there are mods who can fix it.
One thing I have learned on b3ta over the years though, is that people like to define a set of board rules so they can pick on new people when they break one of those rules.
I think it probably has to do with compensating for penis size.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
my penis could perform opera with little or no adjustment.
( ,
Sat 16 Dec 2006, 13:28,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
i only told my doctor!! ;-)
but you are right with that. and, as relatively new people like me try to blend in, they tend to adapt to this behavior.
i really shouldn't complain myself (6M connection), and i try not to flame pictures which are just over the limit, but sometimes a picture seems to lack just the final 2 minutes of effort to optimise, posted by people who should know better (being a member for a year or so).
( ,
Sat 16 Dec 2006, 13:33,
archived)
but you are right with that. and, as relatively new people like me try to blend in, they tend to adapt to this behavior.
i really shouldn't complain myself (6M connection), and i try not to flame pictures which are just over the limit, but sometimes a picture seems to lack just the final 2 minutes of effort to optimise, posted by people who should know better (being a member for a year or so).