b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 7186667 (Thread)

# Pffft.
At least an attempt at a joke there.
(, Mon 14 May 2007, 16:38, archived)
# ^ This
Some arse earlier went beyond even hull.
(, Mon 14 May 2007, 16:45, archived)
# ...
(, Mon 14 May 2007, 16:49, archived)
# your original post there...
had no direct replies telling you off.

It did contain a bit of discussion but nobody actually had a go at you for posting it.

I think this is because you were having a go at the campaign, not the girl and because it was executed with some degree of wit and talent.

So why do you assume everyone who has a problem with the crap unfunny posts on the topic is referring to you?

Edit: typos
(, Mon 14 May 2007, 16:57, archived)
# mockingbird is right again.
I think the only crass one I've seen is the wordmash of the BBC News site this morning.
(, Mon 14 May 2007, 17:01, archived)
# again?
I remember in the mid 80's saying wham were "a bit gay".

Was that the other time?
(, Mon 14 May 2007, 17:19, archived)
# ^ This
Your's was the right side of the line. If all the donators really cared they would do it anonymously (not spelt right prob). :)
(, Mon 14 May 2007, 17:02, archived)
# because I'm deeply insecure? :D
I only came onto b3ta to post that (so didn't see the earlier ones), and I do like to get feedback. Thanks for clarification.
(, Mon 14 May 2007, 17:04, archived)
# it WAS quite good.
I wasn't on when you posted it, I had to go back and look.

I'd like to get my moral outrage on about the quality of parenting/actions of newspapers/appropriateness of this much media focus but I feel to uninformed to do so.

</insecurity blog>
(, Mon 14 May 2007, 17:16, archived)
# more likely
my first musing on the incident
(, Mon 14 May 2007, 17:02, archived)