TOAP seems to me like a very flimsy excuse to mock a picture.
Very flimsy indeed.
( ,
Fri 22 Jun 2007, 13:46,
archived)
It can be justified
If both pic and text are crap and/or unfunny.
( ,
Fri 22 Jun 2007, 13:48,
archived)
It's sprialling out of control!
There can't be many more toap puns left!
( ,
Fri 22 Jun 2007, 13:49,
archived)
I have no grievance against toap in general
It's the "20 seconds per entry on a new thread" frigging dialog boxes that are vexing me.
Click it, click it, click it. Who knows, if it front pages, they may be embarrassed into stopping.
( ,
Fri 22 Jun 2007, 13:49,
archived)
It's the "20 seconds per entry on a new thread" frigging dialog boxes that are vexing me.
Click it, click it, click it. Who knows, if it front pages, they may be embarrassed into stopping.
I keep telling myself that.
It's how I cope with the grief of not FP'ing.
( ,
Fri 22 Jun 2007, 13:53,
archived)
Pffft.
nice idea but it's not our clicks that front page something.
( ,
Fri 22 Jun 2007, 13:52,
archived)
no but my donation of £500 helped me
it was either that or a gold icon and compulsory blow job off rob
( ,
Fri 22 Jun 2007, 13:55,
archived)
There's fuck all wrong with text on a picture
if it's done properly, with the right font and fits in with the general theme of the picture.
( ,
Fri 22 Jun 2007, 13:52,
archived)