Pollen, yep,
but it's pollination, pollinating, pollinator. Don't ask why, it's the English language, it's not supposed to make sense...
( ,
Tue 4 Feb 2003, 14:44,
archived)
pollenating
is in the dictionary, so that's good enough for me!
( ,
Tue 4 Feb 2003, 14:51,
archived)
oh...
it's not in mine...
Wot dictionary you using? I'm looking at Oxford Dictionaries Online although they are a bit thick sometimes.
( ,
Tue 4 Feb 2003, 14:53,
archived)
Wot dictionary you using? I'm looking at Oxford Dictionaries Online although they are a bit thick sometimes.
I like it that the level of pedantry on here
has come down to comparing dictionaries.
PS: Sorry about the Vimto/Ribena thing. You're probably right.
( ,
Tue 4 Feb 2003, 15:00,
archived)
PS: Sorry about the Vimto/Ribena thing. You're probably right.
ooh ooh
it's an Americanism! :)
Which of course does not make it any less correct. Sorry - I really wasn't being mean-style pedantic (as mr thisyou up there appears to be suggesting). I was just interested.
( ,
Tue 4 Feb 2003, 15:07,
archived)
Which of course does not make it any less correct. Sorry - I really wasn't being mean-style pedantic (as mr thisyou up there appears to be suggesting). I was just interested.
I wasn't really calling you pedantic as such
and if I was, it was the worst case of pot/kettle in recent history.
( ,
Tue 4 Feb 2003, 15:15,
archived)
The English
language is a wonderful thing ;-)
Whisper it quietly, but Tomsk is right
( ,
Tue 4 Feb 2003, 14:45,
archived)
Whisper it quietly, but Tomsk is right