b3ta.com board

Home » Messageboard » Message 7964126 (Thread)

with the little girl and the wino

it was more of a clear cut case I suppose, than if you had two similar cases. And thats without taking into account compatability and all that.

She has nothing to do with her illness, cruel twist of fate. He on the other hand, knew the risks, and went ahead anyway.

But I agree, such issues are complicated

(

Mr.Ons knows you can hear him, Earthmen., Thu 17 Jan 2008, 9:42, archived)

There are some outstandingly great moral dilemmas based around organ transplants.

For instance, what is it that's wrong about killing somebody in order to donate all their body parts to other individuals who would otherwise quickly die? The principle of ownership of one's own body parts, that's what. Which would seem to suggest that you can (morally) fuck up as many livers as you like without being refused new ones.

(_Felix 's school of dance and occult sciences, Thu 17 Jan 2008, 9:48, archived)

If by killing one person you could save 4 others, 2 people get kidneys, 1 a liver, 1 heart lung, then we should kill off people even if they are fine as 3 other lives will be saved.

(manbear84, Thu 17 Jan 2008, 12:52, archived)

that would be awesome!

...I'm looking in the direction of the prison near where i work.. not sure why?

(

BulldogUgly Visit my profile to see what's between my legs, Thu 17 Jan 2008, 13:52, archived)

Better still

would be to have a liver lottery ona wednesday night. We can line up some C list celebrities to start up Lancelot and away they go. Livers slopping around inside, until a platform rises up, pulling with it a spray painted liver with a number on. Then voiceover man can talk about who its going too whilst the organ people put it in their picnic box and whisk it away to Dudley*.

*Dudley is an example, if this idea comes to fruition and someone from Dudley DOES win then it is entirely coincidental.

(

DLT's Musical Bonanza is totting up the p, Thu 17 Jan 2008, 9:48, archived)